-
COVID-19
Assumption
From March 2020, a COVID-19 lockdown impacted the DCC, the local economy and the community.
Dunedin will face challenges if a significant or protracted COVID-19 community outbreak occurs within the city or region. Migration, visitor numbers and the economy have been, and will continue to be, impacted as a result of the pandemic.
COVID-19 vaccines are starting to be rolled out in New Zealand to border workers and is a plan in place for vaccinating the broader community. This will reduce the chance of future outbreaks and starts to signal the potential end point of this phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Level of uncertainty
Medium/ high
Reason for uncertainty
A number of factors contribute to the uncertainty, including the extent of community transmission over time, new COVID variants, and the extent of on-going border restrictions
Effects of the uncertainty
The potential impacts of the uncertainty arising from COVID-19 are described below.
Assumption
Impacts of COVID-19 on DCC revenue
In the 2020/21 Annual Plan, the DCC anticipated a reduction in operating revenue of $6.5 million. The DCC may experience further revenue challenges as a result of a significant or protracted outbreak of COVID-19.
There is also a risk of reduced revenue from the Waipori Fund and DCC companies as a result of national and global economic changes arising from COVID-19.
It is assumed that revenue will slowly recover as visitor numbers return to pre-COVID levels.
Level of uncertainty
Medium
Reason for uncertainty
A number of factors contribute to the uncertainty, including the extent of community transmission over time, new COVID variants, the timing of a vaccine rollout and the extent of on-going border restrictions.
Effects of the uncertainty
Potential impacts of a significant or protracted outbreak on DCC’s revenue are:
- loss in revenue due to reduced activity
- financial impacts on the DCC, Waipori Fund and DCC companies as a result of changing market conditions
Assumption
Impacts of COVID-19 on DCC services and capital delivery
In 2019/20, there was a delay in delivery of some services and capital programmes due to COVID-19 alert levels.
DCC services and delivery would be impacted by escalating COVID-19 alert levels and continuing impacts on supply chains.
Level of uncertainty
Medium
Reason for uncertainty
A number of factors contribute to the uncertainty, including the extent of community transmission over time, new COVID variants, the timing of a vaccine rollout and the extent of on-going border restrictions.
Effects of the uncertainty
Potential impacts of a significant or protracted outbreak are:
- delay in critical DCC work, including the delivery of infrastructure projects, and impacts from disruptions in the supply chain
- increased pressure and risk to the DCC’s digital infrastructure
- increased costs to respond to changes in central government, Council and community needs, priorities and obligations.
Assumption
Impacts of COVID-19 on DCC staff
During 2020, DCC staff faced increased pressure to deliver functions under stringent business continuity protocols. This included working from home, managing changes, delays or the closure of business activities, ensuring health and safety and wellbeing of staff and contractors, redeployment and adopting civil defence roles in a changing environment.
A significant or protracted outbreak will impact DCC staff and recruitment.
Level of uncertainty
Medium
Reason for uncertainty
A number of factors contribute to the uncertainty, including the extent of community transmission over time, new COVID variants, the timing of a vaccine rollout and the extent of on-going border restrictions.
Effects of the uncertainty
Potential uncertainty in planning for and responding to a changing environment and working conditions for DCC staff.
Potential for recruitment challenges due to on-going border restrictions
Assumption
Impacts of COVID-19 on DCC population, dwelling and rating projections
The DCC’s growth scenarios were reviewed in June 2020 by external consultants Infometrics to assess the potential impact of the pandemic on the growth assumptions. Infometrics suggested minimal impact on population, dwelling and rating unit projections post-COVID-19 outbreak, in part due to the longer term planning horizons for these projections. Infometrics projected the increase in returning New Zealanders would offset a decline in international migration
Level of uncertainty
High
Reason for uncertainty
A number of factors contribute to the uncertainty, including the extent of community transmission over time, new COVID variants, the timing of a vaccine rollout and the extent of on-going border restrictions.
Effects of the uncertainty
Impacts of higher or lower growth than projected are an increase or decrease in demand for services and infrastructure creating potential for under or overspend of the 10 year plan budget.
Assumption
Impacts of COVID-19 on projected visitor numbers on a peak day
In June 2020, Infometrics prepared post- COVID-19 visitor projections.
Infometrics predicts international visitors to Dunedin are not expected to return to pre- COVID-19 (2019) levels until 2031, although total visitors will recover earlier due to growth in domestic visitors.
2018
2028
2038
2048
2058
2068
24,490
26,250
28,713
30,382
32,209
34,420
Source: DCC Post COVID-19 growth projections update
Level of uncertainty
High
Reason for uncertainty
There is increased uncertainty over projected visitor numbers post COVID-19.
Uncertainty over the timing of the border reopening will influence visitor numbers.
Effects of the uncertainty
The potential impact of lower or higher than anticipated visitor growth are impacts on the timing/demand for infrastructure and on the composition of the Dunedin economy.
Assumption
Impacts of COVID-19 on the Dunedin economy
Economic activity in Dunedin city remained resilient in 2020 post-lockdown, despite the stringent public health restrictions put in place nationally.
Although there is uncertainty regarding the pathway to recovery from COVID-19 and its impacts, the Dunedin economy is expected to hold up and recover relatively well due to public sector funded projects.
In particular, the new Dunedin Hospital rebuild as well as Council and University led projects are likely to boost Dunedin’s wider economic activity.
As the rebuild and other major projects get underway, increased demand within the construction, engineering, manufacturing, ICT and technology sectors is anticipated. This will likely further stimulate job opportunities in these sectors.
Level of uncertainty
High
Reason for uncertainty
The medium to longer term impacts of COVID-19 on the Dunedin economy are unknown.
Effects of the uncertainty
Potential impacts of slower than anticipated economic growth are:
- Increased unemployment
- Financial pressure on DCC and communities
- Longer term changes in the composition of the Dunedin economy
- Greater need for support for Dunedin businesses and workers
Assumption
Impacts of COVID-19 on the Dunedin economy cont'd
Over the next 15 years Coastal Otago is expected to have $3.3b of construction projects (valued at $20m or over) almost all of which will be located in Dunedin. Current forecasts suggest this work is 90% public sector driven, with the new Dunedin Hospital expecting to make up 42% of spend and the remainder coming from investment in infrastructure and education.
Level of uncertainty
High
Reason for uncertainty
The medium to longer term impacts of COVID-19 on the Dunedin economy are unknown
Effects of the uncertainty
Young people, Māori, Pasifika, and women are more likely to be disproportionately impacted by job losses in a recession when compared to other groups, based on historical trends. The extent of this impact and on longer term outcomes is yet to be determined
Assumption
Impacts of COVID-19 on the community
The Dunedin community will be impacted by a significant or protracted outbreak of COVID-19.
Māori, Pasifika, and other groups may be disproportionately impacted by COVID-19.
Level of uncertainty
Medium
Reason for uncertainty
Impact of the pandemic on groups within the community is unknown
Effects of the uncertainty
The potential impacts on the community of a significant outbreak include pressure on community wellbeing, including increased demands on support services and agencies.
Greater monitoring of the socio-economic impacts of the pandemic is needed.
-
Demographic change
Assumption
Projected usually resident population growth
Dunedin’s population will grow at a higher rate until 2038 reaching 142,318. From 2038 onwards the population rate will then return to a medium growth scenario
2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 130,520 138,674 142,318 142,985 143,616 144,249 Source:DCC Post COVID-19 growth projections update
Level of uncertainty
Medium/ High
Reason for uncertainty
That resident population growth is higher or lower than projected.
There is increased uncertainty post- COVID-19
Effects of the uncertainty
Potential impacts of higher or lower than anticipated population growth are:
- increased or decreased demand on regulatory services
- increased or decreased demand for services
- higher or lower demand for housing and infrastructure
- higher or lower city emissions
- a larger or smaller than anticipated rating base to fund services.
Assumption
Ageing population
Dunedin’s population is ageing, with 21% of the population projected to be 65 years or over by 2028 (compared to 16% in 2018). By 2038 the 65 years and over demographic will be Dunedin’s second largest age group (after the 25 years and under age group).
Dunedin's age groups over time 65 years and over 16% 18% 21% 22% 23% 24% 23% 45 to 64 years 25% 23% 21% 20% 19% 19% 19% 25 to 44 years 23% 22% 22% 23% 23% 23% 23% 25 years and under 36% 37% 36% 35% 34% 34% 34% 2018 2023 2028 2033 2038 2043 2048 Source: DCC Post COVID-19 growth projections update
Level of uncertainty
Low
Reason for uncertainty
Demographic changes are influenced by many external variables and may happen faster than projected, changing demand for DCC services
Effects of the uncertainty
Potential impacts of the population ageing at a faster rate than anticipated are:
- increased demand for services and infrastructure for older people
- higher demand for housing suitable for an older population
- a higher than anticipated proportion of ratepayers on a fixed income
-
Growth and urban development
Assumption
National Policy Statement for Urban Development
Under the National Policy Statement for Urban Development (NPS-UD), Dunedin is categorised as a tier 2 urban environment.
It is assumed the DCC will meet its requirements to provide sufficient development capacity under the NPS-UD.
Level of uncertainty
Low
Reason for uncertainty
That dwelling growth is higher than anticipated resulting in more demand than anticipated.
That infrastructure delivery/ funding constraints result in a delay in provision of serviced land.
Effects of the uncertainty
Potential effects of Dunedin not meeting its NPS-UD requirements are constrained growth (population and economic) resulting in greater housing affordability issues, widening wealth inequality due to high house prices and potential risk of legal challenge (such as appeals on planning decisions e.g. plan changes).
Assumption
Projected dwelling growth
Dunedin’s dwelling numbers will grow until 2038 reaching a total of 60,511 dwellings. Dwelling growth will then slow.
2018 2028 2038 2048 2058 2068 52,747 57,381 60,511 60,777 61,045 61,314 Source:DCC Post COVID-19 growth projections update
Level of uncertainty
Medium/ High
Reason for uncertainty
That dwelling growth is higher or lower than projected.
There is increased uncertainty post- COVID-19.
Effects of the uncertainty
Potential effects of higher or lower than anticipated dwelling growth are increased or decreased demand on regulatory services to process resource and building consents, increased or decreased demand for services and higher or lower demand for new infrastructure.
Slower than anticipated growth may result in a delay in recovering growth infrastructure costs through development contributions.
-
Climate change
Assumption
Carbon Zero 2030 target
The DCC has declared a climate emergency and adopted a ‘Zero Carbon 2030’ target for Dunedin’s emissions, in two parts:
- net zero emissions of all greenhouse gases other than biogenic methane by 2030, and
- 24 to 47 percent reduction below 2017 biogenic methane emissions by 2050, including 10 per cent reduction below 2017 biogenic methane emissions by 2030.
The DCC also has a commitment to reduce emissions from its own operations, with targets currently under review.
It is assumed the DCC will meet its organisational and city-wide carbon emission targets
Level of uncertainty
High
Reason for uncertainty
The steps and funding needed to achieve the internal and city-wide emissions targets have not been fully scoped.
The DCC faces higher than anticipated financial costs to reduce emissions.
The DCC has difficulty aligning business practices and activity with emissions reduction targets and plans.
Potential lack of community support for emissions reduction plans and projects.
Effects of the uncertainty
The potential impacts of Dunedin not meeting its emissions reduction targets are:
- misalignment with national emissions reduction targets and policy direction
- misalignment with community expectations, leading to negative effects on political and organisational reputation
- potential increase in financial costs due to the need to offset emissions to meet targets or legislative requirements.
Assumption
Climate change projections
The DCC projections are based on two RCPS (global climate models), RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 (outlined below) and are calculated on a 1986 – 2005 baseline year. RCPs are scenarios that describe the alternative pathways of greenhouse gas emissions and are based on different assumptions about population, economic growth, energy consumption and land use over this century.
RCP 4.5: Global emissions peak around mid- century at around 50% higher than 2000 levels and then decline rapidly over 30 years. Population and economic growth are moderate.
RCP 8.5: Global emissions continue to increase rapidly through the early and mid-parts of the century stabilising at 2100 at just over 4 times 2000 levels. Population reaches 12 billion by centuries end. Economic growth is high but assumes much lower incomes and per capita growth in developing countries.
Mean temperature change By 2040: +0.5ºC to +0.6ºC
By 2090: +0.9ºC to +1.8ºCSea level rise (SLR)(metres above baseline) By 2040: +0.19m to +0.27m SLR
By 2090: +0.49m to +0.9m SLRAverage number of hot days per year [temperature >30ºC] (relative to average present, 1 extreme hot day every 5 years) By 2040: On average, 0.5 to 0.6 extreme hot days every year
By 2090: On average, 0.8 to 1.8 extreme hot days every yearAverage number of frost days per year [temperature <0ºC] (relative to average present 9.3 frost days per year) By 2040: On average, 7.5 to 7.4 frost days every year
By 2090: On average, 6.4 to 3.3 frost days per yearAnnual rainfall volume By 2040: +2%By 2090: +5% to +13% Volume of rain during 1hr duration 1:100- year extreme rainfall event (mm of rain increases relative to present 32mm) By 2040: +3.2mm to +3.7mm in an hour period
By 2090: +5.2mm to +11.2mm in an hour periodSnow days Under all scenarios the number of snow days reduces everywhere in Otago. Waves and storm surges Under all scenarios storm surge peaks for the south Otago coast are estimated to increase over the century. Source: NIWA 20198. Otago Climate Change Projections for the Otago Region. Wellington Source: Ministry for the Environment 2017. Coastal Hazards and Climate Change Guidance for Local Government Change. Wellington Level of uncertainty
Medium/ High
Reason for uncertainty
Climate change may occur at a faster or slower rate than anticipated.
Effects of the uncertainty
The potential impacts of greater than projected climate change, particularly sea level rise and extreme rain events are:
- a rapid change in the environment and ecosystems
- a requirement for the DCC to accelerate its adaptation plans to reduce the harm on communities
- an increased cost of adaptation in the short to medium term
- less time for engagement, and planning with the community
- potential for widening wealth inequality and a reduction in social cohesion in affected communities.
-
Resilience and civil defence
Assumption
Resilience to emergencies
Dunedin is at risk of natural disasters, the key risks for the city are:
- flooding due to heavy rain event
- tsunami due to offshore earthquake
- earthquakes and land instability due to fault line shifts
- fires due to hot days.
It is assumed the DCC and community will be impacted by civil defence emergencies.
Level of uncertainty
High
Reason for uncertainty
The number and scale of civil defence emergencies is unknown
Effects of the uncertainty
If a significant disaster occurs that exceeds the DCC’s ability to respond, this will result in:
- risks to infrastructure, property and essential services
- risks to DCC supply chains
- increased pressure on DCC staff to respond while continuing to provide DCC services
- financial impact
- changes to Council priorities in response to emergencies
-
Resource consents for DCC projects
Assumption
Where resource consents are required for DCC projects, it is assumed the conditions of those resource consents will not significantly alter the operating or capital expenditure required to undertake the programmes or projects
Level of uncertainty
Low
Reason for uncertainty
That unexpected resource consent conditions are imposed on DCC projects.
Effects of the uncertainty
Unexpected resource consent conditions could result in unbudgeted capital and/or operating expenditure to progress impacted projects
-
Levels of service
Assumption
While there are some levels of service changes in this 10 year plan e.g. kerbside and Mosgiel Pool, it is assumed existing levels of service will be maintained unless otherwise stated for the duration of the 10 year plan.
Level of uncertainty
Low
Reason for uncertainty
That unexpected changes to levels of service occur
Effects of the uncertainty
Unplanned improvements to service levels require unbudgeted capital and/or operating expenditure.
-
Future legislative changes
Assumption
Proposed 3 Waters reform
The detail of the 3 Waters reform is still being developed.
In line with central government guidance, for the purposes of this 10 year plan it is assumed that the DCC will deliver 3 Waters services over the life of the 10 year plan.
Any flow on impacts of the 3 Waters reform on the DCC will be assessed as part of the analysis of the proposal from central government.
Level of uncertainty
High
Reason for uncertainty
The scope and timing of 3 Waters reform is unknown.
Effects of the uncertainty
The 10 year plan financial assumptions and infrastructure strategy plans specific to 3 Waters do not account for potential changes resulting from future 3 Waters reforms.
Assumption
Proposed RMA changes
Significant changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) have been signalled by central government. A comprehensive review (New Directions for Resource Management in New Zealand) has proposed replacing the RMA with three separate pieces of legislation:
- Natural Built Environments Act
- Strategic Planning Act
- Managed Retreat and Climate Change Adaptation Act.
It is assumed that reform of the RMA will impact on the DCC’s activities
Level of uncertainty
Low
Reason for uncertainty
The scope, specifics and timing of RMA changes are unknown.
Effects of the uncertainty
Potential impacts of significant RMA reform include:
- revision of the District Plan or district planning framework
- changes to DCC consenting processes
- unforeseen requirements for additional operating and capital expenditure.
Assumption
Proposed building regulation changes
Changes to building regulations and/or consenting requirements have been signalled by central Government. Some changes include the Building Law Reform programme and Building for Climate Change.
Level of uncertainty
Medium
Reason for uncertainty
The scope and timing of building regulation changes are unknown
Effects of the uncertainty
Any changes to building regulations and or consenting requirements would impact the DCC as a Building Consent Authority.
Assumption
Climate change related legislative changes
Changes in legislation related to climate change have been signalled by central government.
Level of uncertainty
Medium
Reason for uncertainty
The scope and timing of changes in climate change related legislation are unknown.
Effects of the uncertainty
Significant changes to the climate change related legislation may impact (positively or negatively) on the DCC’s ability to both mitigate and adapt to climate change
-
Waste disposal facilities
Assumption
Green Island landfill’s existing resource consents will in October 2023. Provision has been made for the operating costs of securing a possible extension to this resource consent.
Capacity issues mean a new landfill or alternative waste disposal facility will be required to accommodate Dunedin’s residual waste in future.
The capital programme includes provision for a new landfill at Smooth Hill.
Level of uncertainty
Low
Reason for uncertainty
The timing of a resource consent extension for the Green Island landfill and the new landfill is uncertain (see also the assumption regarding ‘resource consents’ above). The lead time for the development of a new landfill or alternative waste disposal facility is significant and work is currently underway
Effects of the uncertainty
There may be delays or increased costs due to consenting issues and community unease about the location of the new landfill.
-
Financial assumptions
Assumption
Capital expenditure budget for renewals
The levels of renewals budgeted in this 10 year plan and 50 year Infrastructure Strategy will ensure the long term integrity of infrastructure assets.
Level of uncertainty
Low
Reason for uncertainty
Generally, the DCC can determine budgets for renewals, subject to market forces, and legislative and regulatory changes
Effects of the uncertainty
Long term deferral of renewals poses a risk of asset deterioration and compromise of network integrity and requires unbudgeted capital and/or operating expenditure.
Assumption
Internal capacity and capability
Ongoing improvements to work and procurement practices will allow delivery of operational and capital expenditure programmes and projects.
The COVID-19 pandemic may impact on internal capacity and capability to deliver.
Level of uncertainty
Low/ Medium
Reason for uncertainty
Generally, the DCC can determine resourcing for programme and project delivery, subject to market forces.
There is uncertainty about the impact of the pandemic on internal capacity.
Effects of the uncertainty
Failure to adequately resource capital expenditure programmes and projects may impact on delivery, which may result in future unbudgeted capital and/or operating expenditures.
A significant or protracted outbreak of COVID-19 and flow on effects from the pandemic may impact the delivery of the capital programme.
Assumption
External capacity and capability
Sufficient design, engineering and construction capacity, including availability of construction materials, exists to undertake contracted operational and capital expenditure programmes.
The COVID-19 pandemic may impact on external capacity and capability to deliver.
Level of uncertainty
Low/ Medium
Reason for uncertainty
That other large- scale national or local projects (e.g. Christchurch or Dunedin Hospital rebuilds) impact on local industry capacity and capability.
There is uncertainty about the impact of the pandemic on external capacity.
Effects of the uncertainty
Issues with the availability of contractors may cause delays or require unbudgeted capital and/ or operating expenditures.
A significant or protracted outbreak of COVID-19 and flow on effects from the pandemic may impact the delivery of the capital programme.
Assumption
Useful lives of significant assets
The useful lives of significant assets shown in accounting policies and asset management plans have been appropriately assessed.
Level of uncertainty
Low
Reason for uncertainty
Appropriate practices are followed.
Effects of the uncertainty
An unexpected failure of an asset due to an inadequate assessment of the remaining useful life may require unbudgeted capital and/or operating expenditures.
Assumption
Fixed asset valuations
Scheduled revaluations of assets and forecast asset values in the budget are based on the DCC’s valuation policies, which are consistent with accounting standards for Public Benefit Entities.
Level of uncertainty
Low
Reason for uncertainty
Revaluations are scheduled regularly to ensure minimal variation of asset values between valuations. The DCC’s Statement of Accounting policies describes how potential variances are managed within the financial statements.
Effects of the uncertainty
Revaluations are significantly different from the forecasts, which would impact depreciation.
Assumption
Inflation
Inflation adjustors are applied as per the price level adjustors schedule provided below.
Level of uncertainty
Low
Reason for uncertainty
Inflation levels and prices may vary from those projected.
Effects of the uncertainty
Unexpected inflation may require unbudgeted capital and/or operating expenditures.
Assumption
Borrowing Costs
Interest on existing and new debt is calculated at 2.85% per annum for floating debt.
Level of uncertainty
Low
Reason for uncertainty
There is uncertainty on the floating rate debt, but the expectation is that interest rates will stay relatively low for a considerable period.
Effects of the uncertainty
Interest rates may vary from those projected and require unbudgeted financing expenditures.
Assumption
Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency subsidy rates
Revenue from the Waka Kotahi New Zealand Transport Agency (Waka Kotahi) is calculated at the normal funding assistance rates. These are 53% for 2021/22, 52% for 2022/23 and 51% per annum from the 2023/24 year.
Subsidy rates vary depending on the nature of the work being completed.
Waka Kotahi funding constraints (partly driven by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and current income shortfalls in petrol tax) along with changing priorities for Waka Kotahi funding, means that in the short term at least, renewals funding will be limited to $7 – $8 million per annum, short of the $10 – $14 million per annum based on standard Waka Kotahi subsidy rates of 51% – 53%. We need to continue investing in the renewal of the network to ensure levels of service are maintained, therefore it is anticipated that in the short term at least there will be an additional funding requirement from the DCC. This will be financed through a combination of debt and rates funding over the course of the 10 year plan.
Level of uncertainty
Medium
Reason for uncertainty
Subsidy levels may vary from those projected and NZTA agency priorities areas may differ from the DCC’s renewal and capital programme
Effects of the uncertainty
Subsidy revenue may be less than expected and require changes to levels of service and/or unbudgeted capital and expenditures
Assumption
Forecast return on investments
Refer to the Financial Strategy for information on returns from Council-owned companies, the Waipori Fund and the Investment property portfolio.
The target from the Waipori Fund is inflation adjusted using the price level adjustor provided below. The return from Council-owned companies is not inflation adjusted.
Level of uncertainty
Low
Reason for uncertainty
Income from investments may vary from those projected.
Effects of the uncertainty
Investment income may be less than expected requiring changes to levels of service and/or an increase in revenue.
Assumption
Sources of funds for future replacement of significant assets
The Revenue and Financing Policy outlines the funding sources for capital expenditure.
The Financial Strategy outlines the use of debt and other sources to deliver the capital programme while limiting debt to within the debt limits outlined in the Financial Strategy.
Level of uncertainty
Low
Reason for uncertainty
The timing and/ or cost of the capital expenditure programme may vary.
Effects of the uncertainty
Variation to the timing and/or cost of the capital expenditure programme may require changes to levels of service and/ or an increase in revenue
-
Price level adjustors schedule – BERL medium scenario
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 Index Value Roading 1042 1075 1107 1139 1172 1206 1241 1277 1315 1353 Water and environmental 1019 1055 1082 1112 1144 1176 1213 1254 1297 1337 LGCI Opex 1030 1059 1086 1113 1141 1169 1199 1231 1264 1297 LGCI Capex 1030 1061 1089 1117 1147 1177 1209 1244 1279 1314 CPI 1081 1099 1117 1135 1156 1179 1204 1231 1259 1287 Inflation Adjustors – Cumulative Roading 100.00% 103.20% 106.20% 109.30% 112.50% 115.70% 119.10% 122.60% 126.20% 129.80% Water and environmental 100.00% 103.50% 106.20% 109.10% 112.30% 115.40% 119.00% 123.10% 127.30% 131.20% LGCI Opex 100.00% 102.80% 105.40% 108.10% 110.80% 113.50% 116.40% 119.50% 122.70% 125.90% LGCI Capex 100.00% 103.00% 105.70% 108.40% 111.40% 114.30% 117.40% 120.80% 124.20% 127.60% CPI 100.00% 101.70% 103.30% 105.00% 106.90% 109.10% 111.40% 113.90% 116.50% 119.10% Inflation Adjustors – Annual Roading 3.20% 3.00% 2.90% 2.90% 2.90% 2.90% 2.90% 3.00% 2.90% Water and environmental 3.50% 2.60% 2.80% 2.90% 2.80% 3.10% 3.40% 3.40% 3.10% LGCI Opex 2.80% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.50% 2.60% 2.70% 2.70% 2.60% LGCI Capex 3.00% 2.60% 2.60% 2.70% 2.60% 2.70% 2.90% 2.80% 2.70% CPI 1.70% 1.60% 1.60% 1.90% 2.00% 2.10% 2.20% 2.30% 2.20% Roading NZTA Operating Revenue 2.20% 2.00% 2.90% 2.90% 2.90% 2.90% 2.90% 3.00% 2.90% Standard NZTA Subsidy Rate: 53% 52% 51% 51% 51% 51% 51% 51% 51% 51% Source: BERL Local government cost adjustor forecasts: Three scenarios, March 2020 -
Rating unit projections
The projections have been developed to comply with Schedule 10 section 15A of the LGA 2002 and to allow DCC to use these projections in their long term planning process
Rating unit categories 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 2023/2024 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028 2028/2029 2029/2030 2030/2031 Residential and lifestyle 52,676 53,153 53,630 54,106 54,494 54,882 55,269 55,657 56,045 56,385 56,725 Non- residential 4,395 4,435 4,475 4,515 4,515 4,514 4,513 4,512 4,512 4,521 4,529 Other 1,994 1,994 1,994 1,994 1,994 1,994 1,994 1,994 1,994 1,994 1,994 Total rating units 59,065 59,582 60,099 60,615 61,003 61,390 61,776 62,163 62,551 62,900 63,248 .
The average annual increase in total rating units for the 10 year plan 2021-31 period is just under 418 rating units per year, approximately 0.7% per year. The approach differs for each type of rating unit, which is discussed below. The growth projection data used is from the 2020 Post COVID-19 DCC Growth Projections 2018 to 2068.
Residential and Lifestyle – the assumption is that each new dwelling creates a new rating unit. This means that in the long term, the current provision of vacant properties will be replenished as they are utilised. The 2018 rating unit base data is calculated using the DCC’s rating information on land uses. The number of Residential and Lifestyle rating units was then increased by the percentage of growth in dwellings for each five-year period.
Commercial Rating Units – The future demand for Commercial rating units is based on the projected number of people working within the applicable industry sectors. The projected growth rate of commercial rating units is assumed to be equivalent to the projected growth rate in the modified employee count. This presumes that the ratio of commercial rating units to employees remains static. The unit of employment is the Modified Employment Count developed by Market Economics using the Economic Futures Model.
Other rating units – The remaining rating unit categories (Farmland, Churches, Schools, other) make up less than 4% of the total rating units. For simplicity, these rating units are assumed to remain the same.
-
Future for Local Government Review
On 24 April the Minister of Local Government announced that she had established a Ministerial Inquiry into the Future for Local Government.
The overall purpose of the review is to “identify how our system of local democracy needs to evolve over the
next 30 years, to improve the well-being of New Zealand communities and the environment, and actively embody the treaty partnership.
The review includes, but is not limited to, the following:
- roles, functions, and partnerships
- representation and governance and
- funding and financing
The following are the key steps in the review
April 2021: Inquiry begins
30 September 2021: an interim report will be presented to the Minister signalling the probable direction of the review and key next steps
30 September 2022: Draft report and recommendations to be issued for public consultation, and
30 April 2023: Review presents final report to the Minister and Local Government New Zealand.
While the review could recommend significant change to what local government is and does, there is no information available on the likely direction for the review at this time.
Council considers it unlikely that any recommendations could take effect before 1 July 2024 – particularly for changes to roles or functions. Any changes that are made will be incorporated in the 10 year plan 2024-34.
Unless specifically stated otherwise, council has prepared the plan on the assumption its existing role and functions will continue for the life of the plan.