Current Alerts and Notices (View all)

Road conditions(1)

Dunedin City Council – Kaunihera-a-rohe o Otepoti

Part 2: Transport

Executive Summary

Part 2 of this Infrastructure Strategy sets out the Dunedin City Council's (DCC) strategy for managing transport infrastructure for the next 30 years.

The purpose of this part of the Infrastructure Strategy is to:

  • Identify the significant infrastructure issues facing transport for the DCC for the next 30 years
  • Identify how the DCC will manage or influence the issues identified and any subsequent implications.

Dunedin is the second largest city in the South Island with one of the largest territorial authorities in New Zealand. The transport asset base has a total replacement value of $2.4 billion (2024) and assets depreciate by approximately $31.4 million annually. The carriageway (transport corridor) makes up 56% of that asset base, drainage (catch pits, kerb and channel) makes up 18%, and footpaths and cycleways make up 10%. The remaining 16% of assets are street lights, bus shelters, rail, walls and seawalls.

Over the past few years investment in renewals has not kept pace with depreciation (which acts as an indicator for asset consumption).

Under-investing in renewals is not a sustainable approach for infrastructure which is required to success of our communities – environmentally, economically and socially. A poorly maintained transport network will result in increased unplanned failures disrupting essential services, commuters, freight movements and important links across communities and nationally.

Many of Dunedin's transport assets are ageing, with many nearing or exceeding the end of their useful economic lives. This document reflects an increase in capital expenditure to address the age and condition of the asset over the next three years.

The transport part of this Infrastructure Strategy mirrors the Asset Management Plan (AMP) which is provided to NZTA (Waka Kotahi) as a basis for co-funding. Both are about asset management and the investment required to meet community outcomes and expectations.

  • The DCC's strategic priorities for transport network infrastructure

    1.1 The DCC's strategic priorities for transport network infrastructure

    The DCC is still guided by its Integrated Transport Strategy (ITS) of 2013. Until recently, the strategic principles between that document and the Government Policy Statement (GPS) were reasonably aligned. Under the new GPS (GPS 2024), the strategic principles are not aligned.

    Local Government is reliant on co-funding from NZTA for the transport network. In order to obtain that co-funding its work has to align with the current GPS.

    The challenge then lies in aligning with the recent GPS 2024 and the ITS. The two sets of strategic objectives are set side by side below for comparison:

    Table 1: Legislative and planning framework impacting Transport

    GPS 2024 ITS 2013
    Value for Money Travel Choices
    Safety (through increased maintenance, fixing potholes and punitive measures such as fines) Safety (through road interventions, reducing speeds, road safety education)
    Economic Growth and Productivity Freight and Resilience
    Increasing maintenance and resilience Centres (reinvigorating certain town centres)

    Without an aligned approach to infrastructure management, a 30 year infrastructure strategy will constantly change as the GPS changes because of its intrinsic link to co-funding and the minimization of burden on the ratepayer.

    The key strategic priorities for the transport part of this Infrastructure Strategy are drawn from commonalities and agreed Council Zero Carbon goals, the Future Development Strategy (FDS) and subsequent growth and the principles of good asset management.

    • Maintaining and renewing existing assets
    • Providing travel choices
    • Supporting economic productivity
    • Resilience - ensuring the ongoing resilience of Dunedin's transport system and key infrastructure
    • Growth - planning for and responding to growth.

    1.1.1 Safety

    There has been a slight downward trend in deaths and serious injuries on the network over recent years, however crash numbers involving death or serious injury (DSI) has not reduced significantly. In fact, these numbers were the highest since 2019. Of particular concern is that vulnerable road users (VRU’s) are over-represented in crash statistics, for example nearly a quarter (24%) of the DSI crashes involve pedestrians. Road factors are reported as being a causal factor in a significant number (10%) of crashes.

    Infrastructure interventions to help address this were co-funded through the Low Cost Low Risk work programme. The interventions were typically intersection upgrades or roundabouts to improve intersection driver behaviors (to name but a few). The investment was driven on road classification (which assists in determining risk profile) and death and serious injury statistics. Low Cost Low Risk interventions such as these are no longer co-funded by NZTA, nor are they supported by the Government Policy Statement on Land Transport (GPS). Should interventions such as these be favored by the DCC, they will be at full cost to the ratepayer for at least the next three years.


    Figure 1: Map showing vulnerable fatal, serious and minor road user crashes for the period 2017-2021, orange - red being the most intensive crash areas (Source: NZTA, Safer Journeys Risk Assessment Waka Kotahi, MegaMaps RtZ Edition 2)

    1.1.2 Resilience

    There are ongoing responses to managing resilience in the transport corridor across the city, but significant investment is required. As weather events become more frequent consideration will need to be given to whether assumptions and designs for existing assets need to be reconsidered. As an example, should consideration be given to increasing the design assumptions behind road culverts? Do we need to increase their capacity to accommodate more frequent flooding events in the future?

    Through Lifelines, agencies work together to plan alternative routes and develop strategies to respond to weather events and other natural disasters. However, these strategies largely focus on the existing asset, and its capability, not on what the asset should look like in the future.

    Dunedin would need significant investment on its routes into and out of the city (both north and south) as it has limited redundancy from a linear infrastructure perspective (as road and rail largely follow one another into, and out of, the city in both directions). The limited alternative routes are constrained in their ability to take heavy vehicles (and indeed, are themselves prone to flooding and slip risk). This is key to the supply of fast-moving imported consumer goods which predominantly come via road from the Port of Lyttleton.

    There is limited investment in the 9 Year plan to address resilience issues, the investment through Crown Infrastructure Resilience Programme is primarily around areas such as the Peninsula and South Dunedin. The investment profile is small and is only committed for the 2024-2027 National Land Transport Plan (NLTP).

    1.1.3 National Policy Statement for Urban Development

    The Dunedin City District Plan controls what people can do on their land and how it can be developed to achieve sustainable management of natural and physical resources. This includes managing the use and development of natural and physical resources, in a way that enables people and communities to provide for their social, economic, and cultural wellbeing and for their health and safety.

    The National Policy Statement for Urban Development (NPS-UD) 2020 sets out the objectives and policies for planning for well-functioning urban environments under the Resource Management Act 1991. To support growth in the area, a transport assessment of the infrastructure needs for the identified growth areas has been completed. This has been translated into the Future Development Strategy FDS and informs a $20M investment profile for the next ten years.  Growth assumptions are reviewed regularly, and the investment profile for the following 20 years will be reassessed in 2034.

  • The current state of Dunedin's transport network infrastructure

    1.2 The current state of Dunedin's transport network infrastructure

    Investment in renewals has been fiscally constrained over the past five years. Subsequently, there is a catch-up element to the renewal of the existing infrastructure.  Design standards for infrastructure such as road culverts are generally to accommodate 1:20 year flood events.

    The network for cycling and walking has developed over the past 20 years with separated shared paths from the city either side of the Peninsula and along the one-way pairs (SH1) that now provide an “off road” network.  A gap still remains between Portobello School and Ōtākou  in terms of a shared path (the continuation of the Peninsula Connection). There are no connections between the SH88 shared path and the cycleway on SH1 and no off road opportunities for cyclists/walkers from a network coming in from the south which is Dunedin’s largest commuting population.


    Figure 2: Pineapple Rock on the Otago peninsula

  • Significant transport infrastructure opportunities, issues and options for Dunedin

    1.3 Significant transport infrastructure opportunities, issues and options for Dunedin

    1.3.1 Replacing and renewing Dunedin's ageing transport infrastructure

    The DCC will increase renewals investment by 29% over the first two years of the 9 Year Plan and it plans to retain that momentum into the remainder of the 9 Year Plan and beyond. The renewals investment is based on asset lifespan and condition rating. This, of course, will rely on continued co-funding from NZTA.  Without this investment, the condition of the network will continue to deteriorate with levels of service reductions, and future work will need more expensive interventions.

    In the past the DCC has relied more on heavy maintenance to address asset failures versus an optimal programme of renewals which placed a heavy reliance on operating costs, rather than capital.

    1.3.2 Responding to changing needs for transport infrastructure

    The DCC is responding to the demand for increased travel options across the city. The DCC will continue to invest in infrastructure to support and enable all transport modes across the city where funding allows, and where co-investment is supported through alignment with the GPS. Cycle infrastructure in the CBD continues to be plagued by "gaps" joining up the network, and one of the challenges for the review of the walking and cycling network (Strategic Walking and Cycling review) is to address this.


    Figure 3: Cycle counts

    Total cyclists passing a sensor
    Location 20182019202020212022 2023
    Portsmouth Drive 100906 78666 124351 41518 91145 38082
    North Road Cycle Lane 59453 76108 43552 79338 68683 74688
    Harbour Shared Path 64348 69728 69518 46866 56149 55609
    Water of Leith 0 26622 79762 91994 137462 90497
    Great King Street 36158 15082 47685 49026 42854 47946
    Cumberland Street 41840 41061 41562 43894 39032 45182
    Victoria Road off road path 17066 17125 2653 15036 19867 15769
    Portobello (The Cove) 0 0 0 17497 64037 59705
    Anzac Ave - Bike Lane 0 10702 30095 33895 30620 34829
    Portobello (Raynbird Bay boardwalk) 0 0 0 0 35532 36501
    Princes Street shared path 0 0 0 0 527 29893
    SH1/Cumberland St southbound Shared Path 0 0 0 0 425 24175
    Cumberland Street city bound Cyclist 0 0 0 0 0 14875
    Kaikorai Valley Road 0 0 0 0 0 8420
    Gordon Street 0 0 0 0 0 5979
    Gladstone Rd Sth 0 0 0 0 0 4371
    Factory Road Mosgiel 0 0 0 0 0 3992
    Royal Crescent Shared Path 0 0 0 0 0 3886
    Port-Chalmers Shared Path (Blanket Bay) 0 0 0 0 0 528
    Saint Andrew’s Street ext 0 0 0 0 0 204


    Daily average cycle count past available counters (total annual counts / total available counting days across all counters)

    Daily average cycle count past available counters (total annual counts / total available counting days across all counters)
     201520162017201820192020202120222023
    Average Cyclists 170 163 160 157 168 170 166 171 118

    In March 2019, the city established the central city bus hub and in 2020 there was the implementation of a cheaper and simpler fare and card system with the introduction of the Bee card. Both initiatives appear to have encouraged further uptake of public transport with bus patronage steadily increasing in the city.

    Between July and September 2023, more than 850,000 passengers took the bus in Dunedin. This was a 31% rise in passenger numbers compared with the same period pre-Covid.

    In comparison to last year, Dunedin recorded a 28% increase in public transport use in 2023.


    Figure 4: Annual bus patronage

    The DCC works with Otago Regional Council (ORC) to provide shelter and facilities to support bus users and bus drivers. This is funded directly from ORC, and maintenance and upkeep of these facilities is managed under the maintenance contract. If changes to the bus services occur, the DCC works with ORC to change these facilities (if needed).

    1.3.3 Public health and environmental outcomes

    The provision of a safe and reliable transport network supports the use of active transport modes which directly affects public health through reduced road trauma and connected communities that are fit and healthy. It contributes to the DCC’s Zero Carbon goals by providing transport choice across the network.

    1.3.4 Resilience to natural hazards

    Natural hazards pose a lesser risk when infrastructure networks are resilient. Flooding, drought, catchment fire, landslides, rising groundwater, and liquefaction in the event of an earthquake pose the most significant risks to Dunedin's infrastructure. The DCC is working to improve its understanding of natural hazards and to develop options for resilient infrastructure networks into the future, including route resilience.

    Sea level rise, flooding, and storms are predicted to intensify over the next 30 years along with increased slips and erosion, increasing the risk to communities and transport networks. South Dunedin, the most densely populated part of the city, is particularly at risk of sea level rise and rising groundwater levels.

    As weather events become more frequent and severe, the network's ability to recover is put under pressure particularly for communities on vulnerable routes with limited alternative access options. Such examples include:

    • The coastal community of Aramoana (260 residents) is only accessible via one coastal road prone to coastal erosion and regular flooding during king tides
    • Northern coastal roads from Seacliff through to Waikouaiti suffer from land instability (both road and rail) and slips are common
    • Flood waters inundating the Taieri plains where there have been significant downpours in the Strath Taieri area
    • Strath Taieri area (where alluvial fan flooding can occur)
    • Port Otago at Port Chalmers - heavy freight and cruise ship passengers access the Port via State Highway 88. Blueskin Road is the only alternative route; however, it is frequently compromised during severe weather and not suitable for heavy vehicles.

    All routes have been subject to unplanned road closure following significant weather events which have cut off communities and compromised freight routes.

    Renewing ageing infrastructure in flood-prone and coastal erosion areas will reduce some risks arising from natural hazards; however, it will not solve it.

    Alpine Fault Quake Resilience and Lifelines resilience projects will also help to improve the Transport networks’ response to an event.

    In 2024, the Lifelines vulnerability and interdependency study identified a range of strategic initiatives to create a more resilient infrastructure network, as follows:

    • Continuing design and planning work to identify and prioritise responses to natural hazards in high-risk areas – this includes working with communities to identify plans for when to defend, accommodate, or retreat
    • Better understanding routes that provide critical connections, the conditions of these, the pressures, and the level of investment needed to address impacts – this includes identifying priorities for network resilience
    • Engaging in local planning processes to avoid infrastructure and development in areas at risk of natural hazards and climate change
    • Seeking continuous improvement in network resilience through maintenance, renewals, and ‘low cost/low risk’ investments
    • Improving operational responses to events to support quick recovery following disruption to the land transport system
    • Shifting to more adaptable ‘scenarios-based’ planning
    • Improving personal security for people using the region’s transport system.

    1.3.5 Planned increases or decreases in levels of service

    The DCC sets levels of service in consultation with its community as part of the 9 Year Plan process. The standards at which the DCC delivers its management and maintenance of the network are a requirement of the Local Government Act 2002. They consist of a service statement, a measure, and a target. The result is transparency for the public and other stakeholders that the network can support lifestyle and business needs, and confidence in the DCC's management of the network.

    As part of the 2024/34 9 Year Plan process the DCC reviewed its levels of service. The only change is that the parking levels of service focus on the use of parking in the city, rather than the more subjective approach of residents’ satisfaction.

    In our last 10 year plan, the DCC acknowledged that Dunedin’s infrastructure networks including transport services, have been neglected in the past. Over many years there has been insufficient investment in their maintenance and renewals, and as a result, the DCC has found itself in catch up mode, where significant work is needed to ensure reliability of its basic infrastructure.

    Since 2021, the DCC has increased its maintenance and renewals spend on these networks, not to increase levels of services, but to maintain existing levels of service. The Transport team will, within is available budget, continually look for ways to ensure maintenance of its levels of service, along with concentrating on delivering a safe network.

    1.3.6 Urban Growth Agenda

    The 2017-2023 Labour Government developed an Urban Growth Agenda that aimed to remove barriers to the supply of land and infrastructure and make room for cities to grow up and out. It has five interconnected focus areas:

    • Infrastructure funding and financing
    • Urban planning
    • Spatial planning
    • Transport pricing
    • Legislative reform.

    As a result of this Agenda, all councils were required to develop a Future Development Strategy (FDS). The FDS for transport has been developed and forms part of the 9 Year Plan. The growth areas identified have been assessed for the need for transport infrastructure to support the predicted growth. The type of infrastructure identified consists of traffic signals, roundabouts, new and extended footpaths, and kerb build outs (to name but a few). This infrastructure helps support growth by enabling travel options, managing safety, and reducing congestion. However, in light of the GPS 2024, that infrastructure is unlikely to be currently co-funded by NZTA.

    1.3.7 Government Policy Statement on Land Transport

    The Government has four strategic priorities which GPS (2024) will deliver against:

    • Economic Growth and Productivity
    • Increased Maintenance and Resilience
    • Safety
    • Value for Money.

    The Economic Growth and Productivity strategic priority is the overarching strategic priority for the direction of this GPS. Increased maintenance and resilience, safety and value for money are all equally weighted and important priorities that collectively support the delivery of a transport system that drives economic growth and productivity.

    1.3.8 Zero Carbon 2030 target

    In June 2019, DCC declared a climate emergency. The 'Zero Carbon 2030' target seeks to achieve city-wide net carbon neutrality (excluding biogenic methane) by 2030. The transport sector is Dunedin's most significant, and fastest growing, source of emissions. On-road transport generates 56% of transport sector emissions. Cars generate almost half of all on-road emissions. Many more trips are taken by car than by commercial vehicles (e.g. light trucks, SUVs), but petrol (used by most cars) is less carbon intensive than diesel (used by most commercial vehicles).

    A further third of emissions is generated by trips taken in light commercial vehicles. Trips by heavy vehicles and buses make up the remainder.

    Emissions from this sector are closely linked to urban form, which in turn is greatly influenced by the provision of transport and 3 Waters network infrastructure. Trends suggest that with increasing investment in infrastructure to improve the levels of service for active and public transport modes, there is a slow increase in uptake, and with increasing intensification of urban form, these trends are likely to continue.

    Overall, intensification enabled by the 2GP, Dunedin's District Plan, is likely to continue to promote shorter commutes and greater use of public and active modes. However, enabling density in planning frameworks doesn't mean it will happen. Development needs to be attractive and there needs to be supporting services like water and transport networks.

    The DCC is also taking account of Zero Carbon targets in its spatial planning for the city, including the need for density close to centres and public transport. The key themes in the Zero Carbon plan to support carbon neutral by 2030 from a transport perspective are:

    • Developing convenient and attractive walking and cycling networks and public transport services.
    • Boosting travel demand management to support use of active and public transport modes.
    • Shifting freight to low emissions.
    • Decarbonisation of the Heavy Vehicle fleet.

  • The plan to address Dunedin's network infrastructure issues over the next 30 years

    1.4 The plan to address Dunedin's network infrastructure issues over the next 30 years

    In developing the Infrastructure Strategy for the DCC, the focus has shifted to renewal of the existing asset to align with GPS 2024 and subsequent NZTA co-funding. However, regardless of Government policy, asset management and renewals are a known need that is not subject to change as the Government changes. Consistent investment in renewals over the 30 year period will ensure two things, the first that it meets the expectations of the city in terms of provision of existing infrastructure, the second that it ensures the city is not faced with a bow wave of renewals capital in the future associated with deferring asset management driven renewal activities.

    The overarching strategic premise of the Infrastructure Strategy is to address deferrals in a way that maintains existing service levels and minimises disruption. Sustainability for the contracting market is also another consideration, and costs have been prepared with market capacity in mind forecasting stepped increases to allow for growth to deliver a sustainable volume of renewals.

    The Infrastructure Strategy therefore proposes sustained renewal investment.

    The level of investment in transport renewals across the city aims to maintain existing levels of service. It focusses on replacing existing assets based on asset management principles of age and conditions. Overall, in the mid to long term, budgets are set with the aim of retaining an asset management driven approach to renewals based on age and condition.

    Sea walls, retaining walls and drainage work programmes continue to be assessed considering changing weather patterns however, significant investment to mitigate the impact from seal level rise in the transport corridor is unlikely.

    Long-term investment in the transport network will need to focus on resilience to natural hazards (e.g. St Clair sea wall) and consider efficiency and movement of freight and people on the transport corridor.

    Continued investment in transport options (where co-funding allows) will need future consideration, as may alternative forms of public transport to support growth and the growing demand for end-to-end public transport journeys.

    The DCC has included other projects in the Regional Land Transport Plan, and as the NLTP has been recently released, it is clear funding for walking, cycling and safety interventions (such as pedestrian crossings, kerb build outs) are not a priority of GPS 2024 and will not be co-funded at least for the next three years. However, given the DCC’s commitment to Zero Carbon 2030, Council has chosen to signal investment in walking and cycling infrastructure in Year 3 of the 9Y plan, in anticipation of co-funding for this type of activity to return in the future.

    However, the community expects safety interventions in the transport corridor to support the liveability of their communities. These interventions are part of the 9 Year Plan but will need to be wholly DCC funded. These interventions do not align with GPS 2024. Recognizing the likelihood of the need to catch up on this investment, larger allowances have been made in year 5 of the 9 Year Plan for this activity.

    Economic development is another area of focus for the Infrastructure Strategy. Ensuring our networks support supply chains that support and grow our economic activity will be important for the future.

    Transport infrastructure connects Dunedin to other regions and countries through state highways, the South Island main trunk railway line, Port of Otago and Dunedin Airport. Ongoing investment in land transport (road and rail) is important to enable the export sector to maintain (if not grow) and reflects the importance of the freight task to gross domestic product.

    Port of Otago is New Zealand's second only deep-water port and highest export port (in $/commodity value). Southland export products such as meat and dairy are almost exclusively exported through Port of Otago (and is predominantly transported to Dunedin by rail).

    Port of Otago will be moving part of their operation to Mosgiel and is in the process of establishing an inland Port (to the west end of Mosgiel). This inland Port will prove much needed capacity for the Port’s operations. The DCC supports the citing of the inland Port and is working with developers to assess the impact on traffic volume from this location to Port of Otago. It is unlikely that the transport corridor around Mosgiel will see any significant increase in heavy vehicle movement for the first five years of the inland Port’s operations there, or that there will be a reliance on rail transport from Mosgiel to the Port. The DCC will work with developers to establish what impact (if any) the operation has on the transport corridor and will include any recommendations for additional infrastructure in future RLTP’s.

    The forestry sector is growing in and around the Otago/Southland area, and approximately 100 log trucks traverse the highways and roads of Dunedin to Port of Otago every day to serve this market. The DCC is currently investigating whether this product could transfer to rail, via an inland port south of the Dunedin area (Clutha District). Mode choice for freight is largely a commercial choice so understanding what interventions local and central government can make in this industry is complex. DCC does however, recognize that Gordon Road (the main street through Mosgiel, and a state highway) plays home to many of these logging trucks passing through from their origin to their destination, and the impact this has on liveability, retail, and amenity.

    A transport plan for Mosgiel is due to be completed in 2024-2027. The outcomes of this transport plan are to establish the next level of transport investment required for the Mosgiel area over the next ten years, identifying issues and opportunities in the transport network, and noting that the DCC is already working with other parties to support the citing of Port of Otago’s inland port west of Mosgiel.

  • Why is our infrastructure important?

    1.5 Why is our infrastructure important?

    1.5.1 Purpose of the transport network

    The role of the transport network is to provide safe access to move people and goods to destinations. To support that the DCC manages the following assets.

    • 1,076km of sealed roads
    • 681km of unsealed roads
    • 983km of footpaths and cycleways
    • 251 bridges
    • 42km of seawalls
    • Shelters 369 (please note these are owned by DCC, but their renewal and maintenance is 100% funded by ORC)
    • 8,760 catch pits (chambers/mudtanks) (3% increase from 2021-2031 Long Term Plan)
    • 5,780 culverts (pipes)
    • Parking management system that ensures the community has access to businesses and services
    • Streetlights.


    Figure 5: Diagram of transport infrastructure

  • How does the DCC assess the condition of transport assets?

    1.6 How does the DCC assess the condition of transport assets?

    The Transport team uses a rolling programme of condition assessments and age profiles to inform renewals decisions. For co-funding from NZTA Waka Kotahi, an Asset Management Plan is required. The level of confidence in the knowledge of the DCC's transport assets is high.

    All assets have a finite lifespan, but they differ in terms of their use. Many things influence how an asset performs against that lifespan. Exposure to environmental conditions, different material composition, use (both in weight and frequency) are but a few of the contributors to asset condition. Sometimes assets can be extended beyond their predicted lifespan, but other times those contributors to asset condition will create a situation where the asset needs to be replaced at end of life, or before.

    Overall fiscal constraints in previous years have meant DCC has not met its asset management driven targets for renewals. Since 2021, the gap between asset management driven replacement and available funding has been 2021 (-15%), 2022 (-13%) and 2023 (-9%). As a result, renewals values have increased by 29% from the 2022/23 financial year.

    Assets are not all installed or renewed at the same time, and, as such, the asset management driven spend on renewals is not linear. Equally, the contributors to asset condition (discussed above) can speed up asset management replacement needs and subsequently change the overall investment profile.

    To manage asset needs and fiscal constraints, strategies have been employed to increase the assets’ longevity. In some cases, however, these strategies only last so long. For example, the maximum number of seal layers you can add to a road is six, after that a full rehabilitation should take place. Failing to do that (and adding additional layers) will add to the crown of the road and exacerbate drainage issues. Six percent of the current network has six or more seal layers.


    Figure 6: Seal layers

    Deferral is a strategy to manage fiscal constraints associated with asset management. This approach is illustrated in our kerb and channel condition rating. A high percentage of this asset is rated poor or very poor in terms of condition so it will take a number of years to address the backlog in their asset renewal.

    The higher costs across the construction sector post Covid have compounded the fiscal constraints with asset renewals. Footpath renewals (although flatlined from an asset replacement value) are opening up in cost differential in comparison to previous years (i.e. prices are higher), so renewals values reflect increased costs for this asset renewal.

    1.6.1 Summary of transport assets

    Asset group and typeNumber/Length Value
    $000
    Asset condition Asset capacity
    Paved roads 1,076 km $619,131 Some assets in poor condition Road pavements are in decline. Most of Dunedin's sealed pavements have a theoretical useful life ranging from 60-100 years. 50% of pavements are aged 60 years and over. Based on condition assessment road condition is in decline. Smooth travel exposure for urban roads has sat below target for the past 6 years and has slowly declined.Dunedin's roads have been built up over decades of overlaying surfaces with a new seal. The maximum number of seals should be 6 layers; 5.8% of the network currently has 6 or more seal layers with 16.9% facing a last seal. Capacity issues in some areas and/or capacity issues can be expected In capacity terms, the Dunedin urban network is experiencing congestion at certain parts of the day. Interventions such as the Harbor Arterial bypass and many of the Shaping Future Dunedin Transport projects, including some funded wholly by Waka Kotahi and ORC, are designed to enable mode shift to help reduce congestion around the new Dunedin hospital.
    Unsealed gravel roads 681km $16,202 No or few assets in poor condition Gravel roads are maintained in a good condition. Dust suppression application has changed meaning residents can co-pay for dust suppression or otta sealing.The latter causes less dust issues but does rely on resident co-funding. In the short term we may see an increase in the volume of dust on un-sealed roads. No or minor capacity issues and none are currently expected In capacity terms the Dunedin transport network is fit for purpose and can cope with traffic demands.
    Footpaths and Cycleways 2.14km² $161,838 Significant number of assets in poor condition There are a high percentage of footpaths that have exceeded their life or are nearing the end of their economic life. Asphalt footpaths, that represent 85% of footpaths, have approximately 23% of the network at the end or nearing the end of their expected economic life. Concrete footpaths, that make up 6% of footpaths, have approximately 43% exceeding their expected economic life. Slurry seals, that represent 9% of footpaths, have 84% exceeding or nearing the end of their expected economic life. In the past 3 years 11% of the network has shown signs of deteriorating with a higher proportion moving to average condition from good to very good. No or minor capacity issues and none are currently expected In capacity terms, Dunedin's footpaths are fit for purpose and can cope with pedestrian demands. There are no new footpath or footpath extensions planned unless they are funded as part of growth under the Future Development Strategy or through Development Contributions.
    Road drainage Surface Water Channels 1,140km $306,823 Significant number of assets in poor condition Surface Water Channel, particularly kerb and channel condition, is showing signs of decline. In 2022/23, 12% of the network was in poor to very poor condition and without increased investment this is expected to rise as more reach the end of their economic lives. No or minor capacity issues and none are currently expected The surface water channel is fit for purpose in terms of water carrying capacity and generally only declines in terms of capacity if it is not maintained well. This asset provides a like for like capacity outcome when renewed at existing locations. 
    Signs, road markings, signals, outreaches, controllers and poles

    23,559 (non-electronic signs)

    52 sets of traffic signals

    4,135 outreaches

    14,242 controllers

    19,379 poles (signs, signals and streetlights)

    $36,344 No or few assets in poor condition Signs, road markings and signals are maintained to a good condition. No or minor capacity issues and none are currently expected General road signs have a limited impact on capacity.Traffic signals do have an impact on capacity and ongoing monitoring of those traffic signals can lead to interventions that can create more capacity (or less congestion) in the transport corridor. These interventions are normally managed by changing phasing and are not related to capital investment in the infrastructure itself.
    Streetlights 14,027 streetlights $10,709 Some assets in poor condition 607 streetlights and bollards are using ageing high pressure sodium light fittings and need renewing to LED fittings. To standardize the asset across the city there is a small amount of heritage lights that need upgraded to the new LED lights. This will mean from a maintainability perspective managing street lights will be consistent across the city and from an operating perspective these lights can also join a central management system (this enables the street lights to be operated remotely). No or minor capacity issues and none are currently expected The capacity of the streetlights themselves is good, and the ability to be able to “remote operate through the CMS system” streetlights means the transport network can respond to events where capacity through the system needs to be managed. All streetlights on the NZTA network were previously managed through the CMS system, these streetlights will be centralized into NZTA’s own CMS system in the future.
    Bridges  251 bridges $292,461 No or few assets in poor condition Bridges are in largely good condition, noting DCC does not have a large number of timber bridges. No or minor capacity issues and none are currently expected The capacity of these assets is fit for purpose, and none of the bridges across the network act as a limiter for overall network capacity (either in traffic volume or axle loading).
    Drainage (Catchpits/ chambers, culverts, pipes) 9,016 catchpits / chambers 5,885 culverts 9,916 pipes $446,491 Some assets in poor condition There are 12 culverts in poor to very poor condition. The condition of 32% of all culverts is unknown at this time. The expected age for mud-tanks is 80 years. 73% are aged between 70-79 years, thus nearing the end of their estimated lives. However, in terms of their structural condition (which is largely unknown), as long as catch pits are adequately maintained it would be expected they would live well beyond their estimated lives. 1,305 catch pits cannot be compliant with contract specifications of 150mm of freeboard from top of silt to bottom of outlet. These are our priority to renew. Capacity issues in some areas and/or capacity issues can be expected Given changing weather patterns, emphasis has been placed on ensuring culverts and catch pits are maintained to a high standard. Capacity may become an issue in the face of significant adverse conditions.
    Sea walls 101,045m2 $68,461 Some assets in poor condition Isolated areas of the West Harbour and Peninsula back beaches are in poor to very poor condition and require remedial work in the short-term. Capacity issues in some areas and/or capacity issues can be expected Isolated areas of the network are compromised during significant weather events and will require future investment.
    Retaining walls 58,653m2 $66,816 Some assets in poor condition Many of Dunedin's retaining walls were made many years ago and do not meet the current design requirements. Many provide resistance to surface erosion, rain, and weathering but are not able to retain saturated retained material. As such many may be at risk of failure during high rainfall vents and are routinely inspected and monitored for movement and condition. Capacity issues in some areas and/or capacity issues can be expected Given changing weather patterns and the age of some retaining walls capacity may become an issue.
    Minor structures (barriers, rails, seats, bollards, others) 282 barriers 2,725m of rails 401 seats 668 bollards $17,552 No or few assets in poor condition Minor structures are maintained regularly and are in good condition. Capacity issues in some areas and/or capacity issues can be expected Good

  • How the infrastructure strategy contributes to Dunedin's community outcomes

    1.7 How the infrastructure strategy contributes to Dunedin's community outcomes

    Investing in Dunedin's transport infrastructure will contribute to achieving the city's community outcomes and the vision of making Dunedin one of the world's great small cities. This table shows how key projects link to Dunedin's community outcomes.

    Community outcome

    Transport infrastructure projects contributing to the community outcomes

    A supportive city with caring communities and a great quality of life.

    Renewing existing infrastructure across the city will contribute to the ability to move around productively and will provide transport choices to the community. The ongoing annual programme of renewals will maintain existing levels of service across the transport network, including pavement reseals.

    Ensuring assets are managed and replaced at end of life or use will ensure future generations are not burdened with the debt of deferred maintenance.

    Providing a parking management system that enables the community to find a park with ease will contribute to economic prosperity of the retail sector.

    The Shaping Future Dunedin Transport programme will deliver improvements in the central city and Mosgiel to reduce congestion and provide greater transport choice.

    Planning for and enabling growth (where it occurs) through the provision of infrastructure will enable people to move around the city, ensuring there are transport choices, and support for economic development.

    A connected city with a safe, accessible, and low­ carbon transport system.

    The Tunnels Trail shared path will provide a walking and cycling route linking Dunedin to Mosgiel providing transport choice to the heavily populated areas to the south of the city.

    In Year 3 of the 9Y plan investment is proposed to start working on the remainder of the cycling and walking network, this work will focus on network connections for cycling and walking and “closing the gaps”, particularly around the CBD and some of the suburbs where this infrastructure does not already exist.

    The Shaping Future Dunedin Transport programme will improve transport choices connecting to the central city including upgrades to Princes and Street, St Andrew's Street and a cycleway on Albany Street to support people to move into, out of, and around central Dunedin.

    A successful city with a diverse, innovative and productive economy,

    The Harbour Arterial bypass (as part of the Shaping Future Dunedin Transport (SFDT) programme) will support improvements to the freight network.

    Support for establishing an inland Port in Mosgiel will help grow the export market.

    Investigations into an inland Port south of Dunedin to support the export market for forestry will continue.

  • Where are we now? Dunedin's transport infrastructure

    1.8 Where are we now? Dunedin's transport infrastructure

    Resilience in the transport network infrastructure is under increasing pressure as many assets are becoming more at risk from flooding, erosion and king tides. Generally, the network has sufficient capacity with congestion only experienced in short morning and afternoon commuter peaks.

    In the main urban areas, a small number of key intersections have safety or capacity issues. Mosgiel has capacity and safety issues at the Gordon Road/Gladstone Road intersection, including the rail crossing and the intersection of Quarry Road and SH1, which can cause traffic to back up onto the southern motorway at peak times.

    Portobello Road along the Otago Peninsula and State Highway 88 to Port Chalmers have good provision for cycling and walking between suburbs and into the city centre. In the case of Portobello Road, the road does not allow for safe access to the shared path or public transport on the harbour side of the road (in some areas). In some places, the width of the road makes it either very costly or impossible to provide safe crossing points to the harbour shared pathway or locate bus stops appropriately.

    The intersection between North Road and Opoho Road has safety, capacity and resilience issues, and the intersection between Great King Street and State Highway 1 remains a safety concern. The bottleneck at the North Road and Opoho Road intersection remains a challenge as it is physically constrained.

    Other parts of the network experience congestion for short periods at peak times, but traffic volumes ease quickly, and this is not considered a constraint on future urban development.

    Heavy vehicle movements continue to put pressure on road pavements and deterioration of roading assets is being observed. This is particularly evident on roads from the south to the Port and the inner harbour.

    Over the past few years investment in renewals has not kept pace with depreciation and if not addressed will begin to impact levels of service, growth opportunities and future economic development.

    The detail below presents the deferral of renewals in the past.

    Kerb and Channel (network percentage completed)

    • 2021/2022 0.8% completed vs target of 1.25%
    • 2022/2023 0.7% completed vs target of 1.25%
    • 2023/2024 0.7% completed vs target of 1.25%

    Resealing (network percentage completed)

    • 2021/2022 4.4% completed vs target of 6%
    • 2022/2023 6% completed vs target of 6%
    • 2023/2024 5.1% completed vs target of 6%

    Footpaths (network percentage completed)

    • 2021/2022 2.8% completed vs target of 4%
    • 2022/2023 3.4% completed vs target of 4%
    • 2023/2024 3.3% completed vs target of 4%

    Dunedin's transport network is made up of $2.4 billion worth of assets (2024 replacement value). 50% of Dunedin's sealed pavements are aged 60 years or over (theoretical asset life ranges from 60 to 100 years).

    Road surfaces in Dunedin have an age range of 9-25 years, and 6% of these surfaces are aged 20 years. 42% of these surfaces reach the end of their asset lifespan in years 10-20. The graphs below illustrate the age profile of various assets across the transport portfolio. These graphs indicate the complexity when planning from a budget perspective for asset renewal and illustrate how budget profiles for asset renewals are very rarely (if ever) linear.


    Figure 7: Age profile of sealed pavements

    Age profile of sealed pavements (2022)
    Age in years >100 90-99 80-89 70-79 60-69 50-59 40-49 30-39 20-29 10-19 0-9
    % volume of pavement 0% 6% 11% 12% 21% 13% 7% 6% 8% 10% 6%
    Length 3km 51km 107km 130km 253km 136km 73km 68km 105km 102km 47km


    Figure 7: Age profile of sealed road surfaces

    Age profile of sealed road surfaces (2022)
    Age in years >30 20-30 10-19 0-9
    % volume of road 0% 6% 42% 51%
    Sum of Length 3km 63km 497km 512km

    Dunedin's roads have been built up over many years overlaying surfaces with a new seal. This has resulted in the crown of the road being higher than the kerb height in areas and reducing the capacity of the road to hold water during heavy rain events, as well as introducing issues for mobility users. The maximum number of seals should be six layers and 6% of the network currently has six or more seal layers with 16.9% facing a last seal (illustrated below).


    Figure 8: Number of seal layers

    Number of seal layers
    Number of seal layersSeal area% sealed area
    1 >500,000 3.7%
    2 1,500,000 to 2,000,000 19.8%
    3 2,000,000 to 2,500,000 27.3%
    4 2,000,000 to 2,500,000 26.5%
    5 1,000,000 to 1,500,000 16.9%
    6 >500,000 4.1%
    7 >500,000 1.2%
    8 >500,000 0.3%
    9 >500,000 0.2%

    Stormwater assets (kerb and channel, culverts and catch pits) represent 18% of the total value of the asset portfolio. The expected age for kerb and channel is between 60 and 100 years and approximately 31% of the assets are over 60 years (note labelled surface water channels in graph below). Kerb and channel condition ratings show signs of decline with 12% of the network in poor to very poor condition.


    Figure 9: Age profile of water channels and kerb & channels

    Age profile of water channels and kerb & channels
    Age in years% length of surface water channelsLength of surface water channels km)
    >80 4% 47
    70-80 9% 101
    60-69 18% 206
    50-59 18% 204
    40-49 8% 95
    30-39 8% 94
    20-29 15% 168
    10-19 9% 103
    0-9 10% 113


    Figure 9: Condition of water channels and kerb & channels

    Condition of water channels and kerb & channels
     2016/172017/182018/192019/202020/212021/222022/23
    Excellent 25% 9% 9% 19% 10% 5% 8%
    Good 32% 35% 41% 25% 23% 52% 15%
    Moderate 34% 45% 45% 50% 59% 37% 65%
    Poor 8% 8% 5% 5% 6% 3% 9%
    Very poor 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 2% 3%

    Catch pits (mudtanks) have an expected life of 80 years. 72.6% of total catchpits are over 70 years old. Asset management of catchpits is normally through inspection, and they are graded according to their serviceability. Adequately maintained catchpits would be expected to live well beyond their expected (asset) life.


    Figure 10: Age profile of catch pits

    Age profile of catch pits
    Age in years% of total of catch pitsNumber of catch pits
    >80 0.2% 14
    70-80 72.4% 6355
    60-69 1.3% 115
    50-59 3.7% 323
    40-49 3.2% 282
    30-39 0.6% 49
    20-29 4.7% 410
    10-19 6.0% 530
    0-9 8.0% 703

    The asset life of a culvert is 80 years. 43% of these assets are over 70 years. Culverts are regularly inspected for condition and only a small number of culverts are rated in a poor condition. Culverts, however, are subject to influences outside of the asset more than most. Changes in weather patterns and surrounding vegetation can impact culvert performance significantly.


    Figure 11: Age profile of culverts

    Age profile of culverts
    Age in years% of total of culvertsNumber of culverts
    >80 8% 407
    70-80 35% 2362
    60-69 9% 410
    50-59 6% 236
    40-49 3% 194
    30-39 9% 500
    20-29 13% 825
    10-19 10% 570
    0-9 7% 353

    Dunedin has 249 bridges, 728m2 of retaining walls and 101,969m2 of sea walls. Many of Dunedin's bridges are made of stone, wrought iron and steel with some early examples of reinforced concrete. Many other parts of New Zealand have a large component of timber bridges (which have shorter lifespans). In Dunedin, if bridges are suitably maintained there is no requirement for any major bridge replacements in the next ten years.


    Figure 12: Age profile of bridge structures

    Age profile of bridge type structures
    Age in years% of total of bridgesNumber of bridges
    Est > 100 9% 22
    90-100 5% 15
    80-89 7% 24
    70-80 4% 18
    60-69 19% 34
    50-59 16% 42
    40-49 24% 23
    30-39 6% 22
    20-29 5% 15
    10-19 5% 23
    0-9 8% 11

    Most of Dunedin's sea walls are made of stacked rock or stone. They have no estimated replacement date and are expected to last if they are fit for purpose (maintenance of these walls involves restacking the stone when required). The St Clair sea wall has design deficiencies so is regularly monitored and maintained and is currently structurally sound.

    Most of Dunedin's retaining walls are masonry walls or concrete slope facings rather than structural retaining walls. A theoretical life of a retaining wall is 80 years,79% of current retaining walls are past their asset life.


    Figure 13: Age profile of retaining walls

    Age profile of retaining walls
    Age in years% of areaNumber of structures
    Est >80 79% 46,035
    70-80 0% 0
    60-69 0% 104
    50-59 0% 0
    40-49 0% 1
    30-39 0% 0
    20-29 1% 430
    10-19 4% 2,607
    0-9 16% 9,337

    Dunedin's 989kms of footpath are predominantly made of asphalt (85%), the remaining are concrete, metal and slurry. Asphalt has a life expediency of 25-30 years; slurry has 10 years and concrete has 60 years. 23% of the asphalt footpaths are near the end of their asset life. In terms of condition, a reasonably high proportion of footpaths are in poor to very poor condition. In the past three years, footpaths rated poor or very poor represented 18% of the total footpath asset.


    Figure 14: Age profile of footpaths

    Age profile of all footpaths
    Age in years% of areaLength of footpaths (km)
    >70 0% 2
    60-70 1% 17
    50-59 0% 2
    40-49 4% 45
    30-39 4% 37
    20-29 16% 160
    10-19 48% 470
    0-9 26% 256


    Figure 14: Condition profile of footpaths

    Condition profile of footpaths
     2014/152015/162016/172017/182018/192019/202020/212021/22
    Excellent 10% 17% 10% 15% 10% 4% 17% 15%
    Good 32% 32% 24% 32% 32% 34% 33% 57%
    Moderate 47% 40% 36% 36% 40% 44% 40% 23%
    Poor 10% 9% 24% 15% 12% 13% 9% 5%
    Very poor 1% 2% 6% 3% 6% 5% 2% 1%

    The Smooth Travel Exposure survey (below) illustrates that the roughness of Dunedin's roads is increasing. In comparison to other local authorities, Dunedin performs poorly. Smooth Travel Exposure for urban roads has sat below the target measure for the past 11 years (a Department of Internal Affairs measure).


    Figure 15: Percentage of travel on roads smoother than threshold

    Percentage of travel on roads smoother than the threshold
     UrbanRuralAll sealed roadsTarget
    2011/12 76% 92% 79% 80%
    2012/13 77% 92% 80% 80%
    2013/14 78% 91% 81% 80%
    2014/15 78% 94% 81% 80%
    2015/16 77% 94% 80% 80%
    2016/17 77% 94% 80% 80%
    2017/18 74% 94% 78% 80%
    2018/19 73% 94% 77% 80%
    2019/20 73% 93% 77% 80%
    2020/21 73% 91% 76% 80%
    2021/22 73% 92% 77% 80%
    2022/23 72% 92% 76% 80%

    The graph below outlines renewal spend vs actual spend vs depreciation (in the past). Depreciation acts as an indicator for asset consumption, and it shows consistent and material under-investment in the past.


    Figure 16: Depreciation vs renewals

    Annual depreciation vs Renewal ($m)
     Valued depreciationRenewal budgetRenewal Actual/Forecast
    2015 $18.2 $15.3 $10.5
    2016 $18.3 $11.5 $8.4
    2017 $19.0 $11.6 $11.6
    2018 $19.9 $12.0 $11.6
    2019 $20.8 $14.0 $16.3
    2020 $23.1 $18.4 $15.5
    2021 $23.6 $14.8 $17.4
    2022 $24.6 $19.6 $21.3
    2023 $27.4 $21.5 $23.5

    Renewal quantities for the past six years are presented in the graphs below for reseals, footpaths and kerb and channel and show they have consistently been below asset management targets. This has led to a corresponding decline in asset condition and levels of service, and an increase in deferred renewals.

    The 2024 Asset Management Plan and this Infrastructure Strategy propose sustained renewal investment. In 2024-27 this represents a 52% cost increase on the NZTA approved programme for 2021-24 and a 29% cost increase on the DCC’s 2021-24 forecasted spend.

  • Managing Dunedin's transport infrastructure

    1.9 Managing Dunedin's transport infrastructure

    Asset renewal across the city continues to evolve in terms of determining the impact changes in the climate have on the existing asset. Dunedin is not alone in developing the capability to determine where weather events are having an impact on asset condition. Asset renewal capability is robust, but the impact climate change has on those assumptions, is still evolving.

    Dunedin's public transport (bus) network performs well in terms of patronage compared to New Zealand cities of a similar size, but there have been criticisms by bus users at times about the reliability, frequency, and travel times. Dunedin's cycling network still suffers from gaps linking the city, although longer separated cycleways (shared paths) have been reasonably well catered for in the past ten years.

    Several factors are considered when managing Dunedin's transport infrastructure:

    • Asset age, condition, and performance
    • Changes to population and land use
    • Changes to Government Policy Statement on Land Transport
    • Climate change
    • Maintenance to repair defects and preserve remaining asset life.

    The Dunedin Integrated Transport Strategy 2013 is an overarching strategy covering the whole of Dunedin's transport system and is designed to enable the DCC to review its investment priorities and ensure they are relevant to the current and future needs of Dunedin. It identifies and outlines areas of focus developed from several transport challenges and issues that Dunedin faces. The strategy focuses on transport choice whilst maintaining the levels of service for transport corridor users. The corresponding Asset Management Plan determines a condition-based asset renewal programme that sets the level of investment required to maintain the existing transport infrastructure across Dunedin City.

  • Renewing and replacing assets

    1.10 Renewing and replacing assets

    Transport asset risk management is undertaken using a rolling programme of condition assessments to inform renewals decisions.

    Condition is the main indicator used to understand if and how transport assets are deteriorating. The DCC's asset management planning is increasingly focused on asset condition coupled with age profiles and risk assessments. From time to time however, fiscal constraints need to be considered in asset renewal strategies.

    1.10.1 Principal options and implications of replacing and renewing ageing infrastructure.

    The option that the DCC has decided to take in bold.

    1-10 years (2035) 10-30 years (2055) 30-50 years (2075)
    Renewals delivery continues at current rates, with no plans to increase internal or external delivery capacity Transport renewaIs continue to be prioritised in accordance with known asset condition and performance within existing budgets, however ageing assets mean risk to service levels increase. The value of renewals required versus those undertaken will continue for 30 years, based on the increasing age of assets and inflation.

    The value of renewals undertaken is expected to flatline in the long-term.

    The design and delivery of renewals will become more effective in maintaining service levels over the longer term, as internal and external capacity to deliver is increased.

    Renewals delivery is increased over time as internal and external capacity to deliver is increased. As above, however renewals delivery is increased in years 1-3 to reflect asset replacement (based on age and condition rating) needs. From years 3-10 renewals value will be gradually increased year by year.

    The renewals programme will be more effective in reducing maintenance and operating expenditure and reducing the risk of deteriorating service levels.

    Non-critical issues, or those that affect a limited number of customers, can be addressed more

    quickly than they otherwise would.

    As above, however, infrastructure risk profiles will be reduced as delivery of the renewals programme begins to outpace the rate at which asset age and condition deteriorate.

    Operations and maintenance costs can be reduced, and issues will become less prevalent.

    Renewals delivery is accelerated in the early years of the plan, increased overall

    As above, but with significant budget moved to years 1-2 to address priority renewals.

    Deferred or removed projects to be completed.

    The renewals programme will be most effective in reducing maintenance and expenditure. The value of renewals undertaken is expected to flatline at a much faster rate than in other options.

  • Responses to growth or decline in demand

    1.11 Responses to growth or decline in demand

    Factors such as population growth, the rate and type of economic growth, the rate of growth in dwellings and where future housing developments occur will have an impact on the demand for infrastructure.

    In terms of growth, the 2023 Housing Capacity report states that growth peaked at 1.4% for the year to June 2016 and then dropped to 0.5% for the year to June 2020 (mostly due to COVID restrictions). Recently, population growth is increasing again (between 2022-2023), with a 1.1% increase in 2023 from the previous year. Population is expected to grow at a relatively high rate between 2025 – 2034 before slowing between 2034-2055. However, there is a relatively slow rate of growth between 2024-2027 (short-term). This offers an opportunity to respond to the FDS post 2027, noting most of the FDS related transport infrastructure investments will not be co-funded in the short-term. The dwelling growth strategy is centred around intensification of existing urban areas. The following graph has been extrapolated from the growth and economic significant forecasting assumptions for the 9 year plan 2025-34 .


    Figure 17: Dwelling growth

    In 2023, primarily to inform the FDS, an update to the 2021 assessment was undertaken. The update considered recent changes to population growth and development trends, and updated the demand for dwellings, supply of development capacity, and the sufficiency of development capacity to meet demand. To respond to this, an infrastructure programme has been developed which indicates the transport requirements to accommodate areas of growth to support a safe, connected transport network providing transport choices. Congestion does need to be considered, and where possible infrastructure has been planned into areas where congestion (through additional dwellings) might occur. DCC cannot provide for infrastructure for the State Highway to support that growth, however DCC will work with Waka Kotahi NZTA to develop any plans that require changes to the State Highway to accommodate growth.

    Key constraint areas such as Mosgiel will be investigated further in 2025/2026 through transport modelling, and there is work underway to investigate freight movements in/and around the Mosgiel/Taieri area to support the inland Port on Dukes Road and to support economic development and carbon zero goals.

    The changing composition and rate of growth in the economy may impact demand for network infrastructure. For example, the Port of Otago at Port Chalmers is New Zealand's fifth largest port (by commodity value) and a key link in New Zealand's international supply chain as a regional hub for the export of high value products including meat, dairy, timber, fish, horticulture, and other agriculturally based products.

    1.11.1 Principal options and implications

    1-10 years 10-30 years 30-50 years

    The focus for years 1 to 10 is on managing renewals of existing assets.

    Additional work through the Shaping Future Dunedin Transport programme will support network challenges around the new Dunedin Hospital build.

    Ongoing safety enhancements (at intersections and schools) will continue based on road status risk and deaths and serious injury data and are funded through the Low Cost Low Risk programme. In years 2 the Low Cost Low Risk programme will have completed the schools speed management rollout and will focus on intersections requiring infrastructure interventions for a better safety outcome.

    A programme of work will be developed for funding in Year 3 for the walking and cycling network that takes into account the need to provide network connectivity for this mode and to support achieving our Zero Carbon goals.

    A strategic transport study will be undertaken for Mosgiel to identify issues and improvements within the network.

    Transport upgrades, primarily to support new residential intensification and business land areas, within this period include transport corridor safety improvements, and pedestrian and cycling safety and accessibility improvements.

    There are also additional road safety improvements planned in this time period.

    Further development of the cycling network is planned.

    Transport upgrades for this time period have not yet been confirmed.

  • Public Health and environmental outcomes

    1.2 Public Health and environmental outcomes

    The transport network provides important public health and safety benefits to the community and delivers transport choice helping contribute to zero carbon (environmental) outcomes. The ability to be able to move around easily across a variety of modes is linked to health, social and economic benefits. A goal of the Integrated Transport Strategy is to increase the percentage of people who walk, cycle, and take public transport to work from 16 percent to 40 percent by 2024. Committing to the goal of increasing transport choices will also contribute to the city's environmental commitments of being net carbon zero by 2030.

    Death and serious injuries on the transport corridor contribute negatively to public health outcomes both socially and economically.

    An analysis of crash statistics indicates factors which contribute to Dunedin's safety record are;

    • Intersections
    • Young drivers
    • Older drivers
    • Pedestrians and cyclists.

    Dunedin also has a diverse network ranging from busy urban roads through to quiet rural roads. In some cases, the transition between urban and rural is very abrupt. The central city is also compact and needs to cater for a wide range of user groups, such as cyclists, pedestrians, cars and heavy freight vehicles.

    State Highway 1 runs through the University of Otago, Otago Polytechnic and the CBD, State Highway 87 runs through the Mosgiel centre, and State Highway 88 runs through the Ravensbourne and Port Chalmers communities; they all carry a high number of heavy vehicles.

    Heavy vehicles also service the CBD and industrial areas such as South Dunedin. This sometimes creates conflict with users of the transport corridor at peak times (whether for school or work). Revising the roading bylaw to determine the best times for heavy vehicle deliveries to these centres is a workstream the DCC's Transport team are undertaking in 2024/25.

    Improving network safety is an issue to be addressed through specific safety improvement programmes (where it is cost effective to do so).

    Safety interventions undertaken by the transport group include:

    • Upgrading infrastructure around schools to calm traffic
    • Upgrading pedestrian facilities
    • Using fixed safety cameras at intersections and other high-risk areas (where funding is available)
    • Implementing a prioritized programme of safety engineering projects.

    1.12.1 Principal options and implications for responding to public health and environmental concerns

    The option that the DCC has decided to take is shown in bold.

     10 years (2034)10-30 years (2054) 30-50 years (2074)
    Existing public health and environmental impacts are not prioritized. Transport, limited network safety improvement packages are implemented, resulting in no decreases to the numbers of serious injury or death statistics on the Dunedin transport network. No specific investment to decrease the number of serious injuries or deaths on the Dunedin transport network. No specific investment to decrease the number of serious injuries or deaths on the Dunedin transport network.

    Improve public health and environmental outcomes by investing in public transport and transport corridor safety programs.

    Investment is increased over time

    Transport investments, including expanded Road Safety and Travel Demand Management Programmes are focused on reducing deaths and serious injury in high risk transport corridor locations.

    Public Health outcomes are also achieved by continued investment in active transport modes such as walking and cycling.

    Continued investment in road safety and active transport modes results in decreased road trauma on the transport network and a healthy connected community. Continued investment in road safety and active transport modes results in decreased road trauma on the transport network and a healthy connected community.

    Prioritise public health and environmental concerns over other considerations.

    Investment is prioritised in the earlier years of the plan

    Reducing the number of deaths and serious injury is achieved by additional investment in transport corridor safety. As above. As above.

  • Resilience to natural hazards

    1.13 Resilience to natural hazards

    1.13.1 Environmental impacts

    Flooding, landslides, drought, catchment fire, rising groundwater, and the risk of liquefaction in the event of an earthquake pose the most significant risks to Dunedin's infrastructure. It is anticipated these risks will increase over time as a result of climate change. Resilience funding from central government has been made available in 2024, however this is specific to areas identified in the application (namely Andersons Bay and Portobello Road).

    The biggest issue to Dunedin from an environmental, climate change and natural disaster perspective is its network to the north, south and west. As evidenced in the October 2024 flood event, it is not unusual for all routes to be severed into and out of the city.

    1.13.2 Climate Change

    Climate change impacts include more extreme rainfall events, causing increased frequency and severity of flood events. Rising groundwater as a result of sea level rise in low-lying areas is the one of the most significant risks facing Dunedin from climate change. High groundwater and increased rainfall can contribute to asset renewal acceleration, and recent examples on accelerated asset failure (water levels have reduced reseal longevity) from flood events, can be seen as a result of Cyclone Gabrielle.

    1.13.3 Earthquakes

    Seismic activity can cause widespread damage to network infrastructure. Destruction of critical built infrastructure can impact the transport network. Dunedin has several areas with moderate to high likelihood of liquefaction in an earthquake. Seismic activity could also cause isolation across the transport network if certain areas are cut off due to rubble, slips, liquefaction, or land displacement. frequently


    Figure 18: Akatore fault MMI intensity classes

    Estimated ground shaking expressed in MMI intensity classes for a magnitude 7 earthquake centres on the Akatore fault. Intensities of VII and VIII would be expected to be in coastal sectors of much of the Dunedin district and would be likely to generate liquefaction in susceptible locations.

    1.13.4 Building resilience to natural hazards

    The Peninsula Connection project is an example of building a more resilient asset by raising the road to allow for predicted sea level rise while widening the transport corridor (for safety purposes) and creating a shared path (for mode choice purposes). The remaining section of this corridor between Portobello and Ōtākou remains at risk from a resilience perspective, and the section of corridor at Fisheries Wharf before Ōtākou is frequently flooded in weather events and high tides.

    As part of building resilience to natural hazards, DCC (as part of the Climate Adaptation work) will be investigating whether existing assets (such as road culverts) need to be reconsidered in terms of their design standards. Building culverts for 1:70 year events, and raising the transport corridor (where it is vulnerable to sea level rise) are expensive responses to adaptation. However, over the next three years consideration will need to be given to the existing infrastructure and its resilience to the increasing number of events and their increased severity.

    Planning is underway to look at the resilience of the transport network in the case of a seismic event, specifically around the supply chain and getting goods to and from Dunedin. Planning is also underway for any Alpine Fault activity. In a seismic event involving the Alpine Fault, Dunedin may be the least affected so may have to become a recovery hub for the lower South Island.

    The GPS 2024 response to resilience is in addressing the existing maintenance and renewals task. This is one of the GPS sites as “increased maintenance and resilience”. That resilience is achieved through increased expenditure on potholes, resealing and rehabilitation. Apart from the small about of funding discussed earlier ($1.5M over 2024-2027 NLTP) there is no co-funding for raising the height of the transport corridor or increasing the size of road culverts etc. A more strategic response to this will be considered as part of the climate adaptation strategy underway.

    Central Government response to Cyclone Gabrielle and responding the communities at risk in terms of exposure to natural hazards will determine the strategic approach taken over the next ten years for the transport network.

    1.13.5 Principal options and implications for building resilience to natural hazards

    The option that the DCC has decided to take is shown in bold.

    10-years (2034) 10-30 years (2054) 30-50 years (2074}
    Planned renewals and projects will reduce some risks arising from natural hazards. Existing transport infrastructure is renewed like for like. Significant weather events will remain a problem for isolated areas of the network; largely in coastal, slip prone and low-lying areas. Existing transport infrastructure renewed like-for-like. Significant weather events will remain a problem for isolated areas of the network; largely in coastal, slip prone and low-lying areas. Existing transport infrastructure renewed like for like. Significant weather events will remain a problem for isolated areas of the network; largely in coastal, slip prone and low-lying areas.
    Invest in new capital to specifically reduce the risk arising from natural hazards.

    As above, however investment is made in specific new projects to minimise the risks from natural hazards.

    Undertake adaptive planning pathways - events are uncertain and so infrastructure planning will need to be agile and adapt to various scenarios.

    New capital incorporated into renewals where a known hazard requires mitigation. New capital incorporated into renewals where a known hazard requires mitigation.

  • Planned increase or decrease in levels of service

    1.14 Planned increase or decrease in levels of service

    The priority service levels for the transport network are:

    • Asset Management - the transport network is renewed in accordance with asset age and condition.
    • Cost efficiency - The relative costs and efficiency of the network compared with other networks.
    • Economic Productivity – The network supports ongoing economic productivity in the city including supporting economic productivity of the supply chain to and from other regions.

    There are projects in the capital programme that aim to respond to levels of service across the city in light of the hospital rebuild and growth in the city, detailed below:

    • Harbour arterial improvements - the harbour arterial route would run along Wharf St and Thomas Burns St to provide an alternative route bypassing the city centre, avoiding the new hospital during and after construction
    • Park and Ride facilities at Mosgiel and Burnside - parking areas, where people can leave their car and catch a city-bound express bus service
    • Central city parking management - implementation of a plan to improve the parking experience, wayfinding of parking, and a review of the pricing structure of parking, to encourage better parking options for the CBD which will contribute to economic development
    • Bus priority measures and safety improvements - providing infrastructure to prioritise buses and safety improvements for pedestrians in and around the CBD
    • The Tunnels Trail – cycleway connection between Mosgiel and Dunedin.
    • Cycling and Walking infrastructure that assists in meeting Zero Carbon goals and provides greater network connectivity for this mode across the City.

    1.14.1 Principal options and implications for increasing or decreasing levels of service

    The option that the DCC has decided to take is shown in bold.

    Option 10-years (2034} 10-30 years (2054} 30-50 years (2075}
    Plan and invest to maintain service levels. Focus on renewing network infrastructure to reduce the risk of declining service levels. Do not plan or invest for changes to service levels. Maintain capacity to manage current risk, however no increases in service levels may undermine growth in future. A demographically driven decline in population may mean costs directly linked to service level delivery are borne by fewer residents if growth does not occur.
    Plan and invest to maintain and increase some strategic service levels. Renew infrastructure to reduce the risk of declining service levels and to increase resilience, while also investing in improving strategic service levels. Balance our ability to manage future demands with strategic investments aimed at encouraging sustainable growth through improved service levels.

    If investing in infrastructure to attract more people to live and study in Dunedin results in higher than projected growth, this may improve ongoing affordability of service level increases.

    A long-term investment programme is built up from enhanced monitoring and investment can be phased to deliver maximum benefits and efficiencies.

    Plan and invest to increase some strategic service levels through enhanced projects.

    Renew infrastructure to reduce the risk of declining service levels and to increase resilience, while investing strongly in significantly improving strategic service levels through new and enhanced projects.

    High likelihood this option is not deliverable.

    If strong growth does not occur, a higher cost will be borne by existing residents. This may limit the ability to maintain and operate changes to service levels. The impact on rates of any changes in strategic service levels are currently not understood, and so best practicable options cannot be chosen. There is the risk that abortive work will be undertaken and additional spend needed to meet new standards. If investing in infrastructure to attract more people to live and study in Dunedin results in higher than projected growth, this may improve ongoing affordability of service level increases.  

    There is only one change to existing service levels reflected in the parking metric below.

    Level of service statement ID # Performance measure Data source Actual
    2023-24
    Target
    Year 1 2025-26 Year 2
    2026-27
    Year 3
    2027-28
    Year 4 - 9
    2028-34
    The transport network facilitates efficient travel

    LOS2434

    #101

    Percentage of residents satisfied with overall roading and maintenance ROS 26%

    ≥60%

    ≥60% ≥60% ≥60%
    The transport network facilitates active travel

    LOS2434

    #102

    Percentage of residents satisfied with the suitability of the road network for cyclists throughout the city ROS 30 ≥30% ≥30% ≥30% ≥30%

    LOS2434

    #103

    Percentage of residents satisfied with condition of footpaths throughout the city ROS 36 ≥60% ≥60% ≥60% ≥60%

    LOS2434

    #104

    Percentage of residents satisfied with the ease of pedestrian access throughout the city

    ROS

    54 ≥65% ≥65% ≥65%

    LOS2434

    #105

    Percentage of residents satisfied with condition of the streetlights throughout the city

    ROS61 ≥75% ≥75% ≥75%
    The DCC provides kerb and channel within the level of service standard adopted by the Council Asset Management Plan

    LOS2434

    #107

    Percentage of the kerb and channel network is rated as moderate to excellent condition Road Assessment and Maintenance Management (RAMM) 88% ≥88% ≥89% ≥89% ≥90%
    The DCC provides footpaths within the level of service standard adopted by the Council Asset Management Plan

    LOS2434

    #108

    Percentage of the footpath network is rated as moderate to excellent condition Road Assessment and Maintenance Management (RAMM) 92.7% ≥89% ≥90% ≥90% ≥90%
    The DCC provides a functional streetlight network that provides for safe movement

    LOS2434

    #109

    Percentage of streetlights monitored by the Central Management System (CMS) that will be operational during the hours of darkness CMS system 99.10% ≥99% ≥99% ≥99% ≥99%
    The DCC’s Parking management system provides on road parking capacity and turnover to enable access to businesses and services

    LOS2434

    #110

    Percentage of metered city parking spaces vacant in the CBD retail core during business hours (0800-1800) New system New measure Establish baseline Reduce year on year Reduce year on year Reduce year on year
    The DCC provides the transport network that facilitates safe travel

    LOS2434

    #111

    The change from the previous financial year in the number of fatalities and serious injury crashes on the local road network expressed as number (Mandatory measure) Waka Kotahi Achieved  
    (decrease of 11 from previous year)
    Reduce year on year Reduce year on year Reduce year on year Reduce year on year
    The DCC provides the transport network that facilitates comfortable travel

    LOS2434

    #112

    Average quality of ride on local sealed road network measured by smooth travel exposure (Mandatory measure) Road Assessment and Maintenance Management (RAMM) 76% ≥76% ≥78% ≥78% ≥78%
    The DCC provides a transport network, which facilitates sustainable maintenance

    LOS2434

    #113

    Percentage of sealed road network that is resurfaced (Mandatory measure) Internal data 6% 6% 6% 6% 6%
    The DCC maintains the transport network efficiently

    LOS2434

    #114

    Percentage of service requests relating to roads and footpaths to where the response is provided within five working days (Mandatory measure) Internal data 85% ≥85% ≥86% ≥86% ≥87%
    The DCC provides cycleways to support multimodal travel for the community

    LOS2434

    #115

    Number of people using cycleways (average daily movements per counter)

    (Level of service statement and measure that will help monitor progress towards Council’s zero carbon 2030 target)

    Cycle counters 118 Increase year on year Increase year on year Increase year on year Increase year on year

  • What we need to do - Dunedin's most likely transport infrastructure scenario and approach to delivering new capital and renewals

    1.15 What we need to do - Dunedin's most likely transport infrastructure scenario and approach to delivering new capital and renewals

    The Infrastructure Strategy is closely linked to the Financial Strategy. The Financial Strategy considers affordability for ratepayers and the DCC as a whole. The DCC has attempted to balance the competing tensions of affordability, maintaining assets and investing for the future, while addressing the financial challenges of increasing costs, delivering large capital projects and increasing network renewals. The Financial Strategy provides strategic financial limits for rates and debt and discusses other funding sources.

  • Major projects and decisions

    1.16 Major projects and decisions

    The Future Development Strategy (FDS) capital is split separately to remaining capital for the purposes of this document.

    The Future Development Strategy (FDS) capital
    ($million) 2025/262026/272027/282028/292029/302030/312031/322032/33Total
    1.0 - FDS - Mosgiel
    1.1 Strengthening of certain roads to support additional volume/weight
    1.2 Kerb build outs and crossing points to support additional traffic and pedestrians
    1.3 Traffic light installations from side roads onto busier roads (intersections)
    1.4 Roundabouts to manage traffic flows, minimising congestion
    1.5 Footpath extensions
    1.6 Raised crossing points to support walking and cycling
    1.7 Making some existing infrastructure capable for walking and cycling (ie bridges)
    SUBTOTAL $1,282 $1,282 $1,282 $1,282 $1,282 $1,282 $1,282 $1,282 $10,256
    FDS - Abbotsford, Green Island, Corstorphine, Kaikorai Valley Road
    2.1 Connection from Fairfield into the Tunnels Trail
    2.2 Seal extensions
    2.3 Kerb build outs to manage intersection turning speed and sightlines
    2.4 Footpath extensions
    2.5 Connections to Kaikorai Valley road from the Tunnels Trail
    2.6 Strengthening of certain roads to support additional volume/weight
    2.7 Cycleway extensions
    2.8  Roundabouts to manage traffic flows, minimising congestion
    2.9 Traffic light installations from side roads onto busier roads (intersections)
    SUBTOTAL $231 $231 $231 $231 $231 $231 $231 $231 $1,848
    3.0 FDS - Pine Hill, NEV, Wakari, Sawyers Bay, St Leonards
    3.1  Roundabouts to manage traffic flows, minimising congestion
    3.2 Footpath extensions
    SUBTOTAL $813 $813 $813 $813 $813 $813 $813 $813 $6,504
    4.0 - FDS - Peninsula
    4.1 Footpath extensions
    4.2 Raised crossing points to support walking and cycling
    4.3 Intersection improvements
    SUBTOTAL $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $150 $1,200
    TOTAL $2,476 $2,476 $2,476 $2,476 $2,476 $2,476 $2,476 $2,476 $19,808
    Major projects and key decisions Issues in response toDescriptionOptionsTypeCost Expected Timing Carbon Neutrality
    Tunnels Trail Providing Transport choice for a large commuting population from the south into Dunedin city.

    Cycleway between Mosgiel and Dunedin, through two disused rail tunnels.

    (Currently not co-funded)

      In 2022 Council made the decision to increase the cycleway budget to $11.4M to accelerate the Tunnels Trail. That was in a co-funded environment. $1M has been retained in the 9 year plan for this project Year 9 (note that funding is considered as part of the Zero Carbon packages) Significant impact
    Parking Management (SFDT). Parking availability and congestion around the new Dunedin Hospital build.

    Parking technology, systems, processes, and policy to make parking in the city more efficient and support economic development of the CBD.

    (Not applicable for co-funding)

      Council decision made in 2021. $1M Within the next 10 years Moderate impact
    Mosgiel Park n Ride (SFDT) Park and Ride Facility at Mosgiel.

    Create a parking area for commuters to use before taking public transport between Mosgiel and Dunedin.

    (Currently co-funded)

      Council decision made on Shaping Future Dunedin (SFDT) portfolio in 2021. $5M Within the next 10 years. Significant impact
    Central City Cycle and Pedestrian Improvements (SFDT) Responding to a need to create better transport choices for people to get around the city and congestion as a result of the New Dunedin hospital build.

    Create better pedestrian and cycling connections around the city.

    (Only approved co-funded project is Albany Street cycleway).

      Council decision made on SFDT portfolio. $3M Within the next 10 years. Moderate impact
    Princes Street (SFDT) Enable buses and walkers and cyclists access to the city through this main route.

    Create bus priority measures along Princes Street (key route for commuters) and safer walking and cycling opportunities.

    (Positive Benefit Cost Ratio and high likelihood of co-funding)

      $7.034M Within the next 10 years. Moderate impact
    Harbour Arterial Efficiency Improvements (SFDT) Enable a vehicle bypass to avoid the area near the new Dunedin Hospital to avoid congestion.

    Changes to Strathallan Street and various areas leading up to exit onto the State Highway (slightly north of the CBD).

    (Currently co-funded)

       $4.3M Within the next 10 years. Minimal impact
    Capital renewal programme Manage asset renewal based on condition and age to maintain levels of service across the city. Footpath, bridge, road servicing and traffic light renewal (minor coastal costs have also been added in $3M).   Council decision $377.736M Within the next 10 years. Minimal impact
    Low Cost Low Risk Work Programme Reducing incident rates for all users.

    Minor safety and efficiency improvements for all users, such as crossing points, roundabouts and intersection enhancements.

    (Currently not funded)

      Continuous programme $9M   
    Peninsula Connection (Boardwalk) Resilience, safety and mode choice on the Peninsula. Build a boardwalk at Latham Bay.   Council decision $3.5M Within the next 10 years. Moderate impact
    Peninsula Connection (Section 9B (Portobello to Weir Road),Section 13 (Tidewater Drive to Ellison Road) and Section 14 (Ellison Road to the Ōtākou Fisheries Wharf). Resilience, safety and mode choice on the Peninsula. Create a shared path and a resilient transport corridor.   Council decision $18.5M Within the next 10 years. Moderate impact
    Zero Carbon High Package - Ōtepoti Pathways – pedestrian improvements Fills priority gaps in the pedestrian network to support greater transport choices and improve safety. Improving walking infrastructure particularly at key destinations e.g. schools, centres.   Council decision $6M Within the next 10 years. Significant impact
    Zero Carbon High Package - Ōtepoti Pathways – cycling improvements Fills priority gaps in the cycle network to support greater transport choices and improve safety. Improving cycle infrastructure particularly filling gaps and at key destinations e.g. schools, centres, key routes.   Council decision $6M Within the next 10 years. Significant impact
    Zero Carbon High Package - Ōtepoti Pathways – George/Bank St improvements Fills a priority gap in the walking and cycling network to support greater transport choices and improve safety. Improved bus stops with bus priority, cycle lanes, pedestrian crossings and intersection improvements.   Council decision $4M Within the next 10 years. Significant impact
    Zero Carbon High Package - Ōtepoti Pathways – Vogel Street improvements Fills a priority gap in the cycle network to support greater transport choices and improve safety. Changes to Vogel St to make it a shared, low speed street.   Council decision $2.3M Within the next 10 years. Significant impact
    Zero Carbon High Package - Ōtepoti Pathways - Caversham to Central City Tunnels Trail link Fills a priority gap in the cycle network to support greater transport choices and improve safety. Connecting the Dunedin Tunnels Trail end (near Sidey Park) to the central city (Vogel St).   Council decision $4M Within the next 10 years. Significant impact
    Zero Carbon High Package - Ōtepoti Pathways - Town Belt improvements Fills a priority gap in the cycle network to support greater transport choices and improve safety. Providing safe walking and cycling connections largely following Queens Dr.   Council decision $2M Within the next 10 years. Significant impact
    Zero Carbon High Package - Ōtepoti Pathways - Hill Suburbs link Fills a priority gap in the cycle network to support greater transport choices and improve safety. Providing a safe cycle route between the central city and at least one of Maori Hill, Roslyn, Wakari, Belleknowes, Mornington.   Council decision $2.7M Within the next 10 years. Significant impact
    Zero Carbon High Package - Bus priority improvements Improve bus journey times and their reliability. Changes to signalised intersections and bus stops.   Council decision $2M Within the next 10 years. Significant impact
    Zero Carbon High Package - Bus network and infrastructure improvements Improve bus journey times and their reliability. Optimising routes and bus stop spacing and provision.   Council decision $2M Within the next 10 years. Significant impact
    Zero Carbon High Package - South Dunedin Safer School Streets Improve South Dunedin walking, cycling and public transport infrastructure to support greater transport choices and improve safety. Safety and network improvements to improve South Dunedin school walking and cycles routes and public transport connections.   Council decision $10M Within the next 10 years. Significant impact
    Zero Carbon High Package - City to Waterfront Bridge Fills a priority gap in the cycle network to support greater transport choices. Building a bridge connecting Steamer Basin with Queens Gardens for people walking and cycling.   Council decision $20M Within the next 10 years. Moderate impact
    Zero Carbon High Package - Shore street/Portsmouth Dr/Portobello Road intersection Fills a priority gap in the walking and cycling network to support greater transport choices and improve safety. Improving the crossing point at this intersection for people walking and cycling.   Council decision $1.4M Within the next 10 years. Moderate impact
    Zero Carbon High Package – Centres Upgrade programme – transport improvements Improve suburban centre transport infrastructure to support greater transport choices and improve safety. Transport improvements in priority suburban centres to complement amenity upgrades.   Council decision $3M Within the next 10 years. Moderate impact
    Zero Carbon High Package - Central City bike parking facilities Provide safe, secure bike parking in the central city to support those travelling to and from the central city by bike. Installing three covered bike parking facilities in the central city.   Council decision $0.24M Within the next 10 years. Moderate impact

  • Approach to delivering the new capital and renewals

    1.17 Approach to delivering the new capital and renewals

    The DCC plans to maintain internal capacity and reduce external (consultant) capacity to deliver the capital programme

    • Using existing staff to project manage new capital projects and reducing external consultant assistance
    • Continuing to deliver the renewals programme internally including continuing to grow capability of internal delivery i.e. engineers' representative and engineers to the contract
    • Continuing to seek opportunities to package works with other large organisations such as Waka Kotahi and ORC to enjoy economies of scale and minimise community impact.


    Figure 19: Transport capital expenditure by type 2025-2034

    Transport capital expenditure by type 2025-2034
    (shown in $M) Year 1
    2025/26
    Year 2
    2026/27
    Year 3
    2027/28
    Year 4
    2028/29
    Year 5
    2029/30
    Year 6
    2030/31
    Year 7
    2031/32
    Year 8
    2032/33
    Year 9
    2033/34
    Year 10
    2034/35
    Footpath Renewals $5.9 $6.2 $7.0 $7.2 $7.4 $7.5 $7.7 $7.9 $8.0 $9.2
    Emergency works $3.9          
    Gravel Road Re-metaling $1.2 $1.3 $1.4 $1.4 $1.4 $1.5 $1.5 $1.5 $1.7 $1.5
    Major Drainage Control $6.3 $6.6 $8.5 $8.7 $8.9 $9.1 $9.4 $9.5 $9.7 $12.5
    Pavement Rehabilitations $3.3 $3.5 $3.7 $3.8 $3.9 $4.0 $4.2 $4.2 $4.2 $4.1
    Pavement Renewals $11.1 $11.8 $12.5 $12.8 $13.1 $13.4 $14.0 $14.0 $14.2 $14.1
    Structure Component Replacement $2.5 $2.2 $2.4 $2.4 $2.9 $2.5 $2.6 $2.6 $3.2 $2.6
    Traffice Services Renewal $1.61 $1.48 $1.56 $1.61 $1.65 $1.68 $1.75 $1.75 $1.79 $1.75
    New Capital Level of Service $18.8 $16.9 $16.7 $16.7 $24.5 $20.1 $7.5 $7.5 $6.7 $6.0
    New Capital Growth $0.0 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5
    Total CAPEX $54.8M $52.5M $57.8M $57.2M $66.3M $62.3M $48.1M $51.5M $51.9M $53.9M
    Table 3 Transport capital and operating expenditure budget
    $ million 2025/262026/272027/282028/292029/302030/312031/322032/332033/342034/35Total
    Operating expenditure $35.5 $39.2 $41.7 $43.3 $46.5 $52.3 $57.6 $57.7 $57.1 $58.3 $489.2
    Depreciation $32.1 $33.0 $34.2 $34.9 $35.8 $36.5 $37.3 $38.1 $38.9 $39.8 $360.7
    Total operating expenditure $67.6 $72.2 $75.9 $78.2 $82.3 $88.9 $94.9 $95.8 $96.0 $98.1 $849.9
    Renewals $35.0 $32.6 $38.6 $36.9 $38.2 $38.6 $39.4 $40.2 $41.4 $42.3 $383.2
    Level of service $18.3 $17.7 $19.3 $18.1 $26.1 $21.8 $6.7 $9.3 $8.4 $8.4 $154.2
    Growth $1.5 $2.6 $2.6 $2.2 $2.0 $2.0 $1.9 $1.9 $2.0 $2.0 $20.8
    Total capital expenditure $54.8 $52.9 $60.5 $57.2 $66.3 $62.3 $48.1 $51.5 $51.9 $52.8 $558.3


    Figure 20: Projected Transport capital renewal expenditure by type in 5 year bands for the 1 to 30 year period

    Projected Transport capital renewal expenditure by type in 5 year bands for the 1 to 30 year period
     2025/26 - 2029/302030/31 - 2034/352035/36 - 2039/402040/41 - 2044/452045/46 - 2049/502050/51 - 2054/55
    Footpath Renewals $33.7 $40.3 $49.7 $56.2 $63.7 $72.0
    Emergency works $3.9      
    Gravel Road Re-Metaling $6.6 $7.5 $8.2 $9.2 $10.4 $11.9
    Major Drainage Control $39.0 $50.1 $67.0 $75.9 $85.9 $97.1
    Pavement Rehabilitations $18.3 $20.6 $22.1 $25.1 $28.4 $32.1
    Pavement Renewals $61.3 $69.4 $76.0 $86.0 $97.4 $110.1
    Structure Component Replacement $12.4 $13.5 $14.2 $16.1 $18.2 $20.6
    Traffic Services Renewal $7.9 $8.7 $9.5 $10.6 $12.0 $13.7
    TOTAL RENEWALS $183.5M $210.5M $247M $279.4M $316.1M $357.6M


    Figure 21: Projected Transport capital capital renewal and operating expenditure in 5 year bands for the 11 to 30 year period.

    Projected Transport capital capital renewal and operating expenditure in 5 year bands for the 11 to 30 year period.
    $ million 2035/36 - 2039/402040/41 - 2044/452045/46 - 2049/502050/51 - 2054/55Total
    Depreciation $211.1 $233.1 $257.3 $284.1 $985.6
    Operating expenditure $315.2 $358.3 $407.4 $463.2 $1,544.0
    Capital renewals expenditure $247.0 $279.4 $316.1 $357.6 $1,200.1
    Table 4: Roading and Footpaths capital and operating expenditure budget, five year bands for the 11 to 30 year period
    $ million 2035/36 - 2039/402040/41 - 2044/452045/46 - 2049/502050/51 - 2054/55Total
    Depreciation $211.1 $233.1 $257.3 $284.1 $985.6
    Operating expenditure $315.2 $358.3 $407.4 $463.2 $1,544.0
    Capital renewals expenditure $247.2 $270.6 $296.4 $324.9 $1,139.1

  • The 30 year plan for transport infrastructure

    1.18 The 30 year plan for transport infrastructure

    The DCC's Transport team will remain focused on maintaining the transport corridor to the appropriate levels of service. Smaller safety interventions will continue as long as Low Cost Low Risk funding is maintained. Council has considered funding the strategic walking and cycling network and has agreed to add capital into Year 3 of the 9Y plan. As these projects are planned, the co-funding environment may change. This will become clearer at the time of the next 10Y plan.

    Delivering the planned renewal and new capital programme is achievable within the capacity of existing external contractors.

    Longer term investments will require further planning and investigation, taking into account climate goals, economic influences and the geo-political world situation. A focus towards a whole of network outcome (i.e. getting through Dunedin, through Mosgiel, to the Port of Otago) will need to be the priority for the next ten years whilst maintaining safety, considering resilience, and supporting economic development.

Still didn't find what you were looking for?