Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
No, keep 231 Stuart Street as a strategic asset
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
The fortune theatre is clearly close to the hearts of the people of Dunedin, and whilst Christchurch is building new smaller theatre venues like the Court - we need to protect ours so we can compete with visitor numbers and we have heritage on our side. Leverage it
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Looks like council has the priorities right with a focus on core infrastructure, nice to see still some allocation to culture and live music - it's what keeps us happy while the work is undertaken.
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
Streamlined and less cost hopefully
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1128472
Submitter name:
Amy Owen
Organisation