Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Please sell the asset
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Could be worth considering a slightly smaller fee for the art gallery as it is smaller/less there
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
I do not support funding for:
- Otepoti Live music action plan
- Heritage action plan
- Dunedin railways ltm & renewal of Taieri George rail track
- Increasing frequency of roadside verges maintance
I would like to see more funding for community housing as I think there is a huge need here that is only going to increase. I am also very concerned about the number of people struggling in Dunedin and the number of people accessing food banks and wonder if DCC can provide more support for people on low incomes
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1128944
Submitter name:
Clare
Organisation