Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
A Three Waters Council-Controlled Organisation (CCO)
Why did you choose this option?
Too much politics involved in infrastructure investment. Water assets should not be a grandstanding clickbait opportunity for councillors and politicians. What’s best for our children? 1 entity across nz is the only option and a CCO is a step in the right direction.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Get infrastructure investment out of politics! A CCO provides a better long term step in the right direction. There’s a reasons DIA got WICS involved early in water reform… then politics got involved and messed it all up.
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1128963
Submitter name:
Organisation