Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Sometimes it is good to eliminate assets that are no longer profitable or have become a drain on ratepayer funding.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
No, do not introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Personally, I would prefer if everyone including local residents, domestic and international visitors pay the same entry fee. Maybe $10. Doesn't sound fair to discourage international visitors.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Nil
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
A Three Waters Council-Controlled Organisation (CCO)
Why did you choose this option?
I think it will be better to have a regional or Southern-wide council controlled organisation that delivers water services. This would facilitate better cooperation and sharing of resources and expertise.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
See above
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1130183
Submitter name:
Andrew Lim
Organisation