Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
$20 is a little steep. I’m travelling internationally now and I wouldn’t pay that. $10 max. I don’t think Toitu is even worth a fee.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
CCO sounds like it’s just adding to the bureaucracy. We need to be doing the opposite, reducing costs and inefficiencies.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
I thought three waters was abandoned? I guess you have to find other ways to milk even more money out of us.
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1130226
Submitter name:
Kalin Geisreiter
Organisation