Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
I am against an increase in budget for cutting grass verges. I think DCC did a great job literally cutting down on this waste of ratepayers money and at the same time allowing biodiverse habitats (i.e. long grass) to thrive. A disappointment to see this being dialled back.
I am also disappointed to see less/no action in the Zero Carbon Space. This is very important and every city needs to contribute their share.
Likewise, the tunnels cycleway trail should be pushed up the agenda. It will be a great asset and will help to reduce traffic and parking congestion and carbon footprint by allowing more commuting by bike from the southern suburbs.
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
Why did you choose this option?
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1130229
Submitter name:
Organisation