Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
What is the condition of the asset?
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
TePapa charges $35
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Yes, I think we should introduce more fees on cruise ship visits. Use the funds to tidy up the Otagon area, the foot path is quite disgusting , there is a problem with drains as well.
What is the main attraction for the cruise ship tourists to visit Dunedin? We need to keep sprucing up the city areas and keep investment coming in. Are we fully exploiting the tourist attractions / wild life ? History of Dunedin?
Look overseas at the local government’s responses to increasing revenues from tourists.
That would be more palatable than continuously increasing rates.
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
Local solutions are best .
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1130296
Submitter name:
Michael shearer
Organisation