Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
I support anything that makes international visitors help pay for city facilities and attractions they use.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
I'd like to see more cycling infrastructure for commuters and connections in and out of the city, for ecomomic reasons (cycle tourism), community wellbeing and lower carbon emissions. I support the Trail from Mosgiel through to Caversham and want to see it put back in the current plan and underway as soon as possible.
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
The existing model has worked well, lifting Dunedin's water quality significantly some years ago. I don't think we should tinker with that.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1130374
Submitter name:
Organisation