Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
No, keep 231 Stuart Street as a strategic asset
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
If you seriously want to pull your promised 17.1 million dollars for performance arts venues, the least you can do is protect the building for when a council who are more committed to their promises is elected.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
No, do not introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Why would they come in that case?
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
It is incredibly dissapointing that 17.1 million dollars which was promised for a perfoming arts venue has been dismissed in two sentences. There is a figurative hole in the heart of the city where professional theatre was, and the poor management of the last general manger and fortune board should not ruin it fo the rest of Dunedin
You promised. Do not go back on your promises.
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
If it's not broke, don't fix it. You don't make much case either way online
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1130377
Submitter name:
Organisation