Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
It has been in Council ownership for a long while and sadly no-one has yet found a use for it.
Save rates and dispose of this.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
No, do not introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
No - $20 should be the fee for a family. ie a couple - children still free.
If those two, why not also Otago Museum?
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
It is vital not to lose control of water services.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
If a company exists, it will be too easy to sell it off at some stage - look at the state on water in UK and several South American countries.
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1130791
Submitter name:
Alan Jackson
Organisation
Retired