Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
The building no longer serves its original purpose and should be sold. Given the shortage of high-quality, central accommodation in the city, I suggest it be marketed with consent to convert it into boutique hotel accommodation, preserving its heritage value while contributing to the city's economic and visitor infrastructure.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Assuming the $20 entry fee applies per venue, I recommend considering a discounted combo ticket for Toitū and DPAG. Many visitors will likely want to experience both, often on the same day - especially if miserable weather. A combo option would add value, encourage attendance, and help maintain visitor numbers while still increasing revenue.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
Retaining full DCC ownership ensures local accountability, alignment with broader council priorities, and better integration with other services. While water charges are initially higher, the long-term savings in debt and interest make this a more financially responsible option. Local control over such a critical service should be preserved.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
I strongly encourage the DCC to explore requiring or incentivising rainwater catchment systems in new builds. This would reduce demand on reticulated supply, support sustainability goals, and help manage long-term infrastructure costs - regardless of the delivery model chosen.
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1130854
Submitter name:
Kirstie Gillon-Wood
Organisation