Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
No, do not introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
I disagree with the proposal to introduce entry fees for international visitors to Dunedin Public Art Gallery and Toitū. While the aim is to generate revenue, this approach risks creating a two-tiered system that compromises the welcoming and inclusive nature of these cultural institutions. As highlighted in the consultation document, these sites are key attractions that help tell Dunedin’s unique stories. Charging international tourists could deter visits, reduce word-of-mouth promotion, and negatively impact the city’s reputation as an open and culturally rich destination.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1130871
Submitter name:
Organisation