Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
No, keep 231 Stuart Street as a strategic asset
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
This is a Dunedin icon! Along with the proposed removal of a dedicated replacement performing arts venue, you are not prioritizing the arts in your planning which is extremely disappointing.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Ta Papa have done this with good effect.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Please consider including Allanton into your planning of this option, as we currently rely solely on tank water and it would be great to have options, considering we pay water rates already but don't benefit at all from a reticulated water supply!
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1130887
Submitter name:
Organisation