Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
No, keep 231 Stuart Street as a strategic asset
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Does that mean it can be sold or enhanced for use if it is kept as a strategic asset ? Sitting there deteriorating is not a good example of stewardship of our history.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Many visitors expect it. We already charge for entry to the Chinese Garden next door.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
The coordination with other Departments would be streamlined I hope at all times without needing to go through another organizations structure.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
I would like water done well to include water metering so that potable water which is expensive is not used to irrigate lawns in Dunedin. If it is allowed then it should be charged for.
Each household should have the healthy requirement needed and have some idea by meter as to what they use over and above that.
We do not want to be short of quality water. It is essential for life.
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1130966
Submitter name:
Louise Croot
Organisation