Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Personally I think it would be high time for the DCC to remove the former Fortune Theatre property of 231 Stuart Street from the property list since the buildings needs lots of earthquake strengthening, upgrade to be done and perhaps it would be better sold to some property developers given it has a Heritage status building.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
No, do not introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Personally I think introducing the entry fee for international visitors wouldn't be fair because it would discourage overseas visitors from visiting our museum and art gallery. Personally I think instead they should keep it free to everyone in the public.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Perhaps they could start refurbishing the toilets in the Dunedin Public Library Moray Place Public Library building given I see that the toilets is in dire need of modern refurbishment. Perhaps it would be time for DCC to start reconsidering efforts to refurbish the toilets for the public library in the Moray Place building.
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
Why did you choose this option?
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1130999
Submitter name:
Peter Lim
Organisation