Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
I'm making a second submission, as it seems this part of the form is for comments on other matters (the layout of the form is confusing).
Regarding climate change and the 2030 net zero target. This needs to be a priority. There is no point in having a net zero target if we don't take strong action to reach it. I'm worried because the language on p. 33 of the consultation document seems like double-speak, as if whoever wrote it knows perfectly well that the goals aren't going to be met but isn't allowed to actually say so. If the two investment packages that were considered were inadequate, we need to find some other way.
We also need to work harder to bring down biogenic methane emissions. Wouldn't it be great if Dunedin could be a leader in that area instead of merely following the central government's rather lukewarm standards?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
Why did you choose this option?
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1131129
Submitter name:
J R Jackson
Organisation