Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Sell it and all the other properties the DCC have purchased and left sitting empty (eg Sammy’s, former Vege Boys Building) or producing no economic value, to help reduce the rates burden on ratepayers.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
How will this be policed? Perhaps $10 would be more acceptable.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
Because it’s time the DCC controlled its own assets instead of creating companies for most of its activities previously performed in-house, all of which are supposedly controlled by DCHL “on behalf of” the City Council. There is no accountability whatsoever.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1131758
Submitter name:
Organisation