Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
No, keep 231 Stuart Street as a strategic asset
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
It was such an asset to the community, surely there is some way we can get it back into use as a theatre?
At the very least we could use it as a key venue in the arts and fringe festivals.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Would be better if it were voluntary, though.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
I am not in favour of the Smooth Hill landfill option.
I think anything that lowers carbon emissions is a good thing.
I am in favour of investment in infrastructure (water, cycleways) and quality of life (playgrounds, library)
I don't care if rates go up if we have good services in a great city.
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
Because people who know about it (council) prefer it.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Spend the money, get it right.
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1131786
Submitter name:
Abigail Smith
Organisation