Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
It is a burden to the rate payers
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
If this makes access to these facilities more sustainable then yes
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Grants review. Lack of transparency in the items left out of the grants review. Lack of transparency about scope.
Do not make any cuts to Ara Toi Funding as it is essential as well as Creative Partnerships who are an essential connector from council to arts communities
Performing Arts Venue. Lack of consultation about removal of line item in the community. Lack of transparency and breaking promises.
Place Based Funding is essential and should be supported.
Zero Carbon shame on the council for not allocating any extra funding
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
A Three Waters Council-Controlled Organisation (CCO)
Why did you choose this option?
ability to borrow more
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
do not go to water metres
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1131970
Submitter name:
Organisation