Current Alerts and Notices (View all)

Road conditions(1) Water shutdowns(2)

Dunedin City Council – Kaunihera-a-rohe o Otepoti

9 yr plan 2025 and Local Water Done Well Submission

Submission

9 year plan feedback

Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
No, keep 231 Stuart Street as a strategic asset

Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Heritage Building MUST be retained

Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)

Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Both World Class Facilities

Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
I have serious concerns over the Grants Review, lack of consultation, lack of transparency, no idea re timeline, with elections looming Councillors need to be more open and transparent regarding their position on DCC Grants and community funding, particularly Place Based Funding. There are numerous and proven examples of positive outcomes across Cultural Social, Economic and Environmental areas - in every accountability report submitted to council. In these challenging financial times, supporting local people to work together in their communities for positive community outcomes, seems an absolute no brainer. These kinds of initiatives have never been more needed. Community Grants represent exceptional value for money. The lack of transparency and engagement concerning the Grants Review is deeply disrespectful to the many people across Otepoti working incredibly hard (now and in the past) to make our city a great place to live for everyone. I strongly urge all councillors to at least maintain the current level of funding for Community Grants, and to seriously consider increasing this funding

Local Water Done Well feedback

Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model

Why did you choose this option?
We need to keep control of our assets

Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?

Supporting information

No associated documents with this submission.

Submitter

Submission id number: 1132049

Submitter name:
Joy Davis

Organisation

Still didn't find what you were looking for?