Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
No, keep 231 Stuart Street as a strategic asset
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
We need to invest in culture. It's a drop in the bucket compared to a lot of other things we need to do.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Agreed that people, especially from wealthier countries, should pay.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
A Three Waters Council-Controlled Organisation (CCO)
Why did you choose this option?
This is basically the only viable option for the country. The national/federal government really needs to step in as more infrastructure needs to be invested in. Smaller cities will not be able to afford their water upgrades if we do not go towards a three-waters like model. Additionally, waters need to be properly consulted on with local iwi and hapu, which is a strength of the three-waters organization.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1132179
Submitter name:
Clare Adams
Organisation