Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Use the money for social housing.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
Much work has already been planned for and done and is in process of being paid for. We are a relatively large rate payer base with, I believe, plans underway to link up with other authorities for economies of scale.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Absolutely essential to include the more rural areas of our catchment where there is an insufficient rate payer base. 3 waters are a human right in our connected world.
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1132463
Submitter name:
Polly Mason
Organisation
Seniors Climate Action Network 7