Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Given there is little the council can do with the building and present funding resources, the only future is through private sector. I just hope it can be used for the community good.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
I think it's a reasonable expectation, though how would this be policed? It would need to be done delicately and without assumptions
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Please find attached a submission re Te Awa Ōtākou/Peninsula Connection
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
Critical water infrastructure should be in house and answerable directly to the city - CCOs are not ideal for accountability and Dunedin has a poor history of CCO management
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
Submitter
Submission id number: 1132485
Submitter name:
Tim Ponting
Organisation