Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
I am torn. What if it could be a valuable heritage asset in future. Is there an alternative heritage use or heritage organisation who could honour the building, an incredible landmark & cherished icon. To sell it seems hasty?
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Visitors often create extra costs including staffing needs so it's fair they pay. Trial $20 & reduce if too onerous
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
We need to keep our water infrastructure in public hands for community accountability & future generations. Ensures partnerships with mana whenua endure.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Toitū Te Tiriti! I support future co-governance models with mana whenua. Water is life!
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1132556
Submitter name:
Jane Hinkley
Organisation