Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
sounds reasonable explained in the flyer
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
No, do not introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
No, I think it's good that people see the art and come anyway it also might affect businesses around it.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
I think in general the marketing of events, workshops and community huis could be better advertised by the city. for example like they do it with the Wanaka app
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
because it's the preferred option and 'in house" sounds like it was in the hand of the people who live here having control over their water instead of giving up control ( i haven't read the full document yet though)
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1132664
Submitter name:
Organisation