Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
No, do not introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Destination playgrounds are not as important as having a theatre. Also, shave some budget from the Smooth Hill proposal. If you want Ōtepoti to be vibrant and thriving YOU NEED TO SUPPORT THE PERFORMING ARTS BY CREATING A MID-SIZED THEATRE SPACE. It is ridiculous to think you can attract people to the city with no regular performance space - some of us theatre practitioners can’t even afford to live in Dunedin anymore because there is nowhere to work! PLEASE REINSTATE THE BUDGET LINE FOR A PERFORMING ARTS VENUE!
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
Why did you choose this option?
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1132841
Submitter name:
Katrina Chandra
Organisation