Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Find another space for professional theatre and build, as promised, please. Give the theatre community the $17 million as planned.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
No, do not introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Up to $10 only - do not want to discourage visitors.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
1. As water is essential to life, it is important to retain as much control over it as possible.
2. If putting a Council controlled company allows both the Council and the water company to borrow more, it runs the risk of spreading the cost into the future. Future citizens will have huge problems (largely of our making) to contend with without our adding further debt.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1132997
Submitter name:
Organisation