Current Alerts and Notices (View all)

Road conditions(1) Water shutdowns(2)

Dunedin City Council – Kaunihera-a-rohe o Otepoti

Single Submission Viewer - Variation 2

Submission point number/s: S185.001

Click on each heading to view the submission details

  • Submitter and address for service details

    Reference: 808640

    Name Andrew Kantor
    Organisation (if applicable) Chorus New Zealand Limited
    Contact person/agent (if different to submitter)

    Postal address (address for service)

    PO Box 6640, Wellesley Street Auckland CBD Auckland 1011
    Email address: andrew.kantor@chorus.co.nz
    Contact phone number: 09 975 3399

  • Hearings

    Do you wish to speak in support of your submission at a hearing Yes
    If others make a similar submission, would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing Yes

  • Trade competition

    I could gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission No
    My submission relates to an effect that I am directly affected by and that: a. adversely affects the environment; and b. does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition.

    No

  • Submission

    Variation 2 change ID F1-1
    Provision name and number, or address and map layer name 9.3.7.X Telecommunications and Power
    My/our submission seeks the following decision from the Council: Accept the change
    Details
    Reasons for these views Chorus supports Rule 9.3.7.X for the following reasons: - It is most appropriate for the UltraFast Broadband (UFB) network to be installed to the legal boundary of allotments at the time of subdivision. Installation at a later date can result in disruptive earthworks in newly formed road corridors and increased costs for the purchaser of the new allotment. - The UFB network is an open-access network. Therefore the provision of UltraFast Broadband to the legal boundary of allotments ensures there is a broader range of telecommunications providers and services available to the end user.

Submission documents

Submission that have been deemed to have 'Out of scope' submission points have had a pdf attached showing the Out-of-scope points highlighted.

No associated documents with this submission.

Still didn't find what you were looking for?