| Submission point number/s: | S183.001 |
Click on each heading to view the submission details
-
Submitter and address for service details
Reference: 808644
Name Trish Brooking Organisation (if applicable) Contact person/agent (if different to submitter) Postal address (address for service)
6 Braeview Cres Maori Hill Dunedin 9010 Email address: trishbrooking@gmail.com Contact phone number: 0272743835 -
Hearings
Do you wish to speak in support of your submission at a hearing No If others make a similar submission, would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing Yes -
Trade competition
I could gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission No My submission relates to an effect that I am directly affected by and that: a. adversely affects the environment; and b. does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. -
Submission
Variation 2 change ID IN09 Provision name and number, or address and map layer name My/our submission seeks the following decision from the Council: Reject the change Details 1. The need for further examination of the basic premise that the area 'is capable of absorbing some intensification without a detrimental effect on its character..'20.4.244 p.179. 2. The costs outweigh the benefits. 3. There are significant infrastructure issues. 4. Adverse effects would impact the values of the area with its heterogeneous attractive streetscape and copious green amenity. 5. In the Appendix under 'flexibility for medium density housing' it states that 'lower quality housing stock' is more likely to be developed. Are there criteria for the definition of 'low quality' and any proposed consultation process with the landowner? Reasons for these views 1. There is a high likelihood of adverse effects on the heritage and cultural values of the area. As a compact green city, Otepoti's future development requiring intensification needs judicious problem solving that will offer protection to the rich varied architectural and historic landscapes for which the city is renown. The area in question with its proximity to the Town Belt, is ill suited for intensification. 2. In terms of costs/benefits the former seem more likely. The costs associated with a dilution of streetscape amenity, coupled with the loss of greenery, outweigh the benefits of achieving 45 more dwellings. It is interesting to note that by limiting the development potential to one habitable room per 100m2 of the site, compared to GEN Res 2 where the limit of one habitable room is for 45m2, already this modification reveals how much of the proposed change will default to Gen Res 1 limit. 3. The area's location at the top of the catchment where waste flow reaches the CBD, is problematic. Issues around storm water capacity and waste water overflow require more detailed attention. Increased traffic flow in the area is a further concern as the current level of public transport would need to be increased to accommodate more sustainable options. 4. The abundant greenscape is home to a multitude of birdlife: kereru, tut,piwakawaka, korimako and waxeyes. The native trees provide them with a rich food source and intensification would undoubtedly result in a significantly reduced and compromised natural environment. Maori Hill is one of three pilot City Sanctuary suburbs in helping to protect wildlife through backyard predator control. Established native trees offer more carbon absorption and the area is a classic example of the need for preservation. As the DCC has proactively indicated, that it will dedicate over $1 million in the next two years towards addressing climate change, it could be viewed as a counterproductive move to intensify existing areas of established greenspace. There is a protected beech tree upwards of 150 years (7279) and a large mature rata bordering the property. 5. In the Appendix the term 'lower quality housing' needs clarification in terms of definition. Who decides? Would the criteria be related to age, materials, condition? Would an independent opinion be sought? The timber heritage villa at 6 Braeview Cres has had two owners in its 115 year history. It belonged to acclaimed photographer Guy Morris, son of John Morris the Dunedin City Corporation Valuer. A friend who works for the UK National Trust identified the many Arts and Crafts features in the house - a revelation to us! As an example of an early twentieth century villa, the prospect of intensification on this site would be detrimental to the unique heritage and historical capital of the area. Thank you for considering this submission.
Submission documents
Submission that have been deemed to have 'Out of scope' submission points have had a pdf attached showing the Out-of-scope points highlighted.
No associated documents with this submission.