| Submission point number/s: | S160.001 S160.002 S160.004 S160.011 S160.012 |
Click on each heading to view the submission details
-
Submitter and address for service details
Reference: 808694
Name Kate Wilson Organisation (if applicable) Dunedin tunnels trails trust Contact person/agent (if different to submitter) Gerard hyland Postal address (address for service)
545 gladbrook road Middlemarch 9597 Email address: Kate@strathburn.co.nz Contact phone number: 0274438134 -
Hearings
Do you wish to speak in support of your submission at a hearing Yes If others make a similar submission, would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing Yes -
Trade competition
I could gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission No My submission relates to an effect that I am directly affected by and that: a. adversely affects the environment; and b. does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. No
-
Submission
Variation 2 change ID Policy 2.2.2.4 we support transport mode shift but think that c and d or a new paragraph should reference existing or planned cycle and walkways, not just public transport. Further reference to access to centres on easy (flat) accesss should be preferred Provision name and number, or address and map layer name Policy 2.2.2.4 x good connectivity and in fact design should require ev car and e bike charging and priority in design for walking and cycling especially where the subdivision is in an area with low elevation to centres or existing or planned cycle ways My/our submission seeks the following decision from the Council: Accept the change with amendments outlined below Details Policy 2.2.2.x should reference connectivity to existing or planned cycle ways or walk ways to centres and reference good design of ev and ebike charging and bike storage policy 2.3.3.1 should reference connectivity and mode shift ie walking, cycling and public transport and support development where these facilities should be accessible Policy 2.4.1.7 this policy needs to require provision of good cycling storage and infrastructure as part of good design Policy 2.6.2.1 adding into this policy access or near an existing or planned cycle or shared path to connect to centres should be included in the criteria in a similar way as c iii provides for public transport Policy 2.6.2.3 perhaps the plan should actively encourage demand for carbon neutral infrastructure upgrades and prioritise them. The plan does not encourage cycling and walking enough or other mode shifts Policy 2.6.2 AA should add connectivity to existing or planned walking and cycling infrastructure Policy 2.7.1.2 should address transport and mode shift, not just water and waste issue Policy 6.2.3.y needs to highlight walking and cycling and public transport connectivity internally to the subdivision and to the surrounding area - priority needs to be for carbon neutral. Also ev. And ebike charging needs to be provided for in subdivisions especially where garages (off site charge capacity) is not provided for. We submit generally for a change to assessment criteria that recognise the above submission points Reasons for these views Generally in support of the plan changes but where there are existing or planned cycle way and walkway provision providing flat or easy connectivity then subdivision should be planned around that and the infrastructure provided
Submission documents
Submission that have been deemed to have 'Out of scope' submission points have had a pdf attached showing the Out-of-scope points highlighted.