| Submission point number/s: | S283.001 S283.002 S283.003 S283.004 S283.005 S283.006 S283.007 S283.008 S283.009 |
Click on each heading to view the submission details
-
Submitter and address for service details
Reference: 809274
Name Max Hope Trust Organisation (if applicable) Max Hope Trust Contact person/agent (if different to submitter) C/- Paterson Pitts Group Postal address (address for service)
PO Box 5933 Moray Place Dunedin 9058 Email address: andrew.robinson@ppgroup.co.nz Contact phone number: -
Hearings
Do you wish to speak in support of your submission at a hearing Yes If others make a similar submission, would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing Yes -
Trade competition
I could gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission No My submission relates to an effect that I am directly affected by and that: a. adversely affects the environment; and b. does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. -
Submission
Variation 2 change ID Rejected site #193 Provision name and number, or address and map layer name 177 Tomahawk Road, review assessment as the site has a number of GR1 attributes My/our submission seeks the following decision from the Council: Reject the change Details 177 Tomahawk Road is recorded on the Data Map as having been assessed for inclusion in the Residential 1 Zone and rejected (site ID #193). This property has good transport links and is located adjacent to a regular bus route. The area has a high level of residential amenity and is just minutes from the central city. Appendix 4 lists the reason for the rejection of the site as "Stormwater discharge from the site is complex and would likely require discharge into Tomahawk Lagoon. This raises significant water quality issues and acceptability to iwi and would likely mean that discharge consent is challenging to obtain." Reasons for these views We are supportive of the notion of the city remaining compact and accessible. We feel that the development of this and adjoining sites is in keeping with this policy; as the site lies between two established suburbs. The locality is popular and has good transport links. The land is of a size and nature that is unsatisfactory for primary production. We support the provision of a minimum site size of 400m² in this zone. Please see the attached document regarding our concerns in regard to stormwater provisions. We believe that relatively straightforward engineering solutions exist for the stormwater issues. Due to the prevalance of residential activity around the periphery of the property and significant areas of favourable terrain, we feel that residential development is viable on the property.
Submission documents
Submission that have been deemed to have 'Out of scope' submission points have had a pdf attached showing the Out-of-scope points highlighted.