| Submission point number/s: | S250.002 S250.003 S250.004 |
Click on each heading to view the submission details
-
Submitter and address for service details
Reference: 809385
Name Meghan Mills Organisation (if applicable) Contact person/agent (if different to submitter) C/- Paterson Pitts Group Postal address (address for service)
PO Box 5933 Moray Place Dunedin 9058 Email address: andrew.robinson@ppgroup.co.nz Contact phone number: -
Hearings
Do you wish to speak in support of your submission at a hearing Yes If others make a similar submission, would you consider presenting a joint case at a hearing Yes -
Trade competition
I could gain an advantage in trade competition through this submission No My submission relates to an effect that I am directly affected by and that: a. adversely affects the environment; and b. does not relate to trade competition or the effects of trade competition. -
Submission
Variation 2 change ID D2, F1 & 2 Provision name and number, or address and map layer name 29 John Street, Ocean View, Transport Connections in Subdivisions, Review of 3 Waters Policy My/our submission seeks the following decision from the Council: Accept the change with amendments outlined below Details Our property is adjacent to a former school site and is well served for both cabled and piped trunk utilities. These are currently under-utilised. Our site is zoned Rural (Coastal). There is a Coastal Character overlay zone over part of our property, which is moderately absurd as the property is separated from the coast by a major road and mature urban development. Presumably the site for the school was chosen, because of its comparatively central location in the township, and the ability of the roading and utilities networks to cope with the demands of the school. We believe that allowing residential development of at least part of our property, will be a good fit within the existing township periphery, as our property abuts mature residential development on two sides. Residential development on our property, would allow existing infrastructure to be efficiently used and reduce the need to remove farmland from rural production. Reasons for these views Our property has strong roading and utility provisions, in part as a legacy of the former site use. We believe that our property is free of geotechnical hazards and is favorably graded, with a good solar aspect. There is a reserve near-by that is under-utilised due to the current low population density in the locality. There is a near-by kindergarten. We feel that the effects on the surrounding environment, that would result from a well-designed residential development, would be less than minor.
Submission documents
Submission that have been deemed to have 'Out of scope' submission points have had a pdf attached showing the Out-of-scope points highlighted.