Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Disappointed with no funding for the caversham tunnel relative to the $750 k for that new flash toilet . I suggest a rethink on that . Overall the plan looks pretty good and quite balanced . It does feel like amenity maintenance in south Dunedin is a lesser standard though would like to see some improvement there lots of weeds and mess around currently. Thanks for considering this submission.
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
Too much uncertainty in other option
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1129801
Submitter name:
Bruce Halligan
Organisation