Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
I feel this is a reasonable charge, to help ease burden on local rate payers
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
A Three Waters Council-Controlled Organisation (CCO)
Why did you choose this option?
I feel spending needs to be made public on this issue, unsure on council controlled organisation, but would be interested in any other option.... to ensure items are clear to the rate payer
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Clarity on money spent and what areas, replacement of current urgent areas and where the council is planning to start, since money earmarked for upgrades should have been previously put aside from our rates, but no one has actually said how much money is currently available in the kitty.
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1131477
Submitter name:
Organisation