Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
No, keep 231 Stuart Street as a strategic asset
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
Renovating this space as a performance space long craved in council discourse is sensible and combines heritage impetus with the desire for more performance spaces in Dunedin.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
No, do not introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
I think it's a good idea to be more prescriptive about the koha. I recently travelled in nations where access to museums was free - and they were definitely abuzz. The last thing we want is to disincentivise visitors to our taonga and museums.
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
The principle of 'keep it local' is one I've never yet seen fail; common sense over outsourcing or failed pathways like those that led to Auckland's disastrous Metro water debacle.
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Learn from the errors of other cities!
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1132486
Submitter name:
Organisation