Submission
9 year plan feedback
Should we remove 231 Stuart Street (formerly the Fortune Theatre) from the list of strategic assets in the DCC Significance and Engagement policy?
Yes, remove 231 Stuart Street from the list of strategic assets (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about 231 Stuart Street?
231 Stuart St should be removed from the SEP strategic asset list and sold for sympathetic development, and profits from this sale must be ring fenced exclusively for investment in performing arts infrastructure.
Should we charge an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) for international visitors aged 16 and over, at Toitū and Dunedin Public Art Gallery?
Yes, introduce an entry fee of $20 (incl. GST) (this is our preferred option)
Do you have any comments about the entry fee for international visitors?
Is there anything else you would like to tell us?
Immediate financial support to be granted for operations of Te Whare o Rukutia. This will require the DCC to reverse its decision to end funding for Te Whare o Rukutia.
The annual Professional Theatre Fund continues, at least at its current level, preferably more.
Financial investment is required for Playhouse Theatre infrastructure.
The DCC commits to create and adopt an Ōtepoti Theatre Action Plan.
This should include the following mid-term actions on infrastructure development, as recommended by the Performing Arts group (Stage South, the Playhouse, the Athenaeum, the Regent) Statement of Intent.
Support for the Playhouse renovations and refurbishment.
Support for the public/private partnership of Athenaeum development to improve the 90 seat fringe theatre and create a significant new music venue.
Support for a new build, community performing arts centre. This will require DCC land or partnerships with landowners to secure a suitable site.
If a memorandum of understanding for a new build is not secured within 18 months, or in the event that DCC will not support a new build, consideration of the support for new infrastructure for the Regent Theatre.
The Dunedin City Libraries are continued to be fully supported.
Please ensure that the Wildlife hospital has continued support.
Support for the Mosgiel tunnel cycelway
Local Water Done Well feedback
Which water services delivery model do you support?
The Council’s preferred option: an in-house delivery model
Why did you choose this option?
Do you have any other feedback related to the proposed water services delivery models?
Supporting information
No associated documents with this submission.
Submitter
Submission id number: 1132814
Submitter name:
MARGARET RYAN
Organisation